Juju Kuli Pamey @ Juju Pame and 3 Ors v. Cholamandalam Ms Gen Ins Company Ltd and 2 Ors

ORDER Date : 09-08-2024 Heard Mr. A. R. Agarwala, learned counsel for the applicant. I have also heard Mr. A. Bhattacharyya, learned counsel for respondent no. 1 and Mr. A. Chandran, learned counsel for the respondent nos. 2 and 3. This is an application filed under section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963 praying for condonation of delay of 13 days in preferring the connected appeal against the judgment and order dated 03.11.2023, passed by the learned Member, MACT No. 2, Kamrup (M), Guwahati in MAC case no. 2025/2021. The ground for delay in not preferring the connected appeal on time has been explained in para 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6 of the condonation petition, and I am satisfied that the applicant has been able to show sufficient cause for not preferring the connected appeal within the stipulated time. Moreover, the learned counsel for the respondent has no objection if the delay of 13 days in preferring the connected appeal is condoned. In view of the above, the delay of 13 days in preferring the connected appeal is hereby condoned. With the above, this IA stands disposed of. The Office shall register the connected appeal, and list it for admission, by Page No.# 4/4 reflecting the name of Mr. A. Bhattacharyya as the learned counsel for respondent no. 1 and Mr. A. Chandran, as the learned counsel for the respondent nos. 2 and 3. JUDGE Comparing Assistant

PageoNo.#o1/4 GAHC010035322024 ooooooo ooooooooooooooo ooooooooooooooooTHEoGAUHATIoHIGHoCOURTo (HIGHoCOURToOFoASSAM,oNAGALAND,oMIZORAMoANDoARUNACHALoPRADESH)o CaseoNo.o:oI.A.(Civil)/881/2024o JUJUoKULIoPAMEYo@oJUJUoPAMEoANDo3oORSo W/OoLATEoBIKASHoPAMEYo@oPAMEo RESIDENToOFoVILLAGEoRAKUToKOKE,oPSoJONAI,oDISToDHEMAJI,oASSAMo 787060 2:oASINoPAME oS/OoLATEoBIKASHoPAMEYo@oPAMEo RESIDENToOFoVILLAGEoRAKUToKOKE oPSoJONAI oDISToDHEMAJI oASSAMo787060o TOoBEoREP.oBYoPET.oNO.o1 3:oKUNJALATAoPAME oW/OoBIMALAoPAMEo RESIDENToOFoVILLAGEoRAKUToKOKE oPSoJONAI oDISToDHEMAJI oASSAMo787060 4:oBIMALAoPAMEYo@oPAME oS/OoLATEoUKELoPAME o RESIDENToOFoVILLAGEoRAKUToKOKE oPSoJONAI oDISToDHEMAJI oASSAMo78706o VERSUSo CHOLAMANDALAMoMSoGENoINSoCOMPANYoLTDoANDo2oORSo AASTHAoPLAZA,oGSoROAD,oBORAoSERVICELoOPP.oSBoDEORAHo COLLEGE,POoGUWAHATIo07,oDISToKAMRUPoMoASSAM Page No.# 2/4 2:ABI TAGA S/O TANIYOK TAGA RESIDENT OF VILLAGE AND PO MIRBUK 791102 PS PASIGHAT DIST EAST SIYANG ARUNACHAL PRADESH 3:KABIT TAGA S/O TAPANG TAGA VILLAGE JOMO PO RUMGONG 791001 DIST WEST SIYANG ARUNACHAL PRADES Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. A R AGARWALA, MR ADITYA AGARWALA,MS. R LAILA,MD. K ALI Advocate for the Respondent : MR. A BHATTACHARYYA (r-1), MR A CHANDRAN(R-2,3) Linked Case : JUJU KULI PAMEY @ JUJU PAME AND 3 ORS VERSUS CHOLAMANDALAM MS GEN INS COMPANY LTD AND 2 ORS (F) ------------ Advocate for : MR. A R AGARWALA Advocate for : appearing for CHOLAMANDALAM MS GEN INS COMPANY LTD AND 2 ORS (F) Page No.# 3/4 BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BUDI HABUNG