- Court
- High Court of Gauhati
- Decided
- 30 April 2024
- Bench
- Arun Dev Choudhury
- Case no.
- I.A.(Crl.) 193/2024
Judgment
ORDER Date : 01.05.2024
Heard Mr. M Biswas learned counsel for the applicant. The present application under section 5 of the Limitation Act is filed for condoning the delay of 6 days in preferring the Page No.# 2/2 criminal appeal. The delay is explained at paragraph No.4 of the Interlocutory Application. Perused the same. Mr. P Borthakur learned Addl. PP submits that since the delay is only of 6 days, he has no objection if the delay is condoned. Considering the submission of the learned counsel for the applicant as well as the pleadings made in paragraph 4 of the interlocutory application, this court is of the opinion that the present applicant was prevented by sufficient cause in preferring the connected appeal within time. Accordingly the delay is condoned. The I.A stands disposed of. Registry to register the connected criminal appeal and list the matter thereafter.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant
Case details
Parties and counsel
Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010035392024 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Crl.)/193/2024 BIPIN KUMAR S/O DHANESWAR SAHANI, VILL.- PRANPUR, P.S.- TISIAUTA, DIST.- BAISHALIU (BIHAR). VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ANR. REP. BY P.P. 2:PRADIP KUMAR SINGHA SUB-INSPECTOR OF POLICE S/O LATE PARAMANANDA SINGHA RAMNAGAR KHELMA P.S.- SILCHAR DIST.- CACHAR (ASSAM) Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. M BISWAS Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN DEV CHOUDHURY
Source: High Court of Gauhati, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.