Dhanjit Debnath v. The State of Assam

PageoNo.#o1/2 GAHC010036192024 ooooooo ooooooooooooooo ooooooooooooooooTHEoGAUHATIoHIGHoCOURTo (HIGHoCOURToOFoASSAM,oNAGALAND,oMIZORAMoANDoARUNACHALoPRADESH)o CaseoNo.o:oAB/457/2024o DHANJIToDEBNATHo S/OoLT.oSUBASHoDEBNATHo R/OoBGoCOLONY,oPRAGJYOTISHoNAGARo (PACHIMoNAMBARI)o P.O.oJALUKBARI,oP.S.oJALUKBARIo DIST.oKAMRUPo(M),oASSAMo PIN-o781013 VERSUSo THEoSTATEoOFoASSAMo REPoBYoTHEoPP,oASSAM AdvocateoforotheoPetitionerooooo:oMR.oMoUoMONDALo AdvocateoforotheoRespondento:oPP,oASSAMoo oooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo B::kBEFOREk::k HON'BLEkMR.kJUSTICEkPARTHIVJYOTIkSAIKIA kOkkkRkkkDkkkEkkkRk

09.04.2024 o Heard the learned counsel Mr. S.S. Ahmed appearing for the petitioner. Also heard Ms. N. Das, the learned Addl. Public Prosecutor representing the State of Page No.# 2/2 Assam.

¶2This is an application under Section 438 of the CrPC in respect of Jalukbari P.S. case No.64/2024 under Sections 457/454/511 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶3Ms. N. Das submits that pursuant to an interim order granted in favour of the petitioner, he has appeared before the Investigating Officer and has co-operated with police investigation. His statement also got recorded.

¶4I find that as the petitioner has co-operated with police investigation, he (the petitioner Dhanjit Debnath) does not deserve to be detained in custody. His pre-arrest bail application is allowed.

¶5The interim bail order granted in favour of the petitioner is made absolute. The application for bail is disposed of.

JUDGE Comparing Assistant