Abdul Hannan Barbhuiya and Anr v. Md. Masiur Rahman and 6 Ors

PageoNo.#o1/3 GAHC010037372024 ooooooo ooooooooooooooo ooooooooooooooooTHEoGAUHATIoHIGHoCOURTo (HIGHoCOURToOFoASSAM,oNAGALAND,oMIZORAMoANDoARUNACHALoPRADESH)o CaseoNo.o:oI.A.(Civil)/815/2024o 1:oABDULoHANNANoBARBHUIYAoANDoANR.o S/O-oLATEoKHALILURoRAHMANoBARBHUIYA,oVILL-oNOONoNAGAR,oP.O.o KATIGORAH,oDIST.-oCACHAR,oASSAM,oPIN-o788805. 2:oNURUALoHAQUEoBARBHUIYA S/O-oLATEoABDULoSATTARoBARBHUIYAoVILL.-oNOONoNAGAR P.O.-oKATIGORAHoDIST.-oCACHARoASSAMoPIN-o788805o oooooooooooooooooooooVERSUSo 1:oMD.oMASIURoRAHMANoANDo6oORS.o S/O-oLATEoJAINoUDDIN,oVILL.-oBEHARAoPART-VI,oP.O.-oHILARA,oP.S.-o KATIGORAH,oDIST.-oCACHAR,oASSAM,oPIN-o788805. 2:THEoCOMMISSIONERoANDoSECRETARYoTOoTHEoGOVT.oOFoASSAM DEPTT.oOFoREVENUEoDISPURoGUWAHATI-o781006. 3:THEoCOMMISSIONERoANDoSECRETARYoTOoTHEoGOVT.oOFoASSAM DEPTT.oOFoFISHERYoDISPURoGUWAHATI-o781006. 4:THEoDEPUTYoCOMMISSIONER CACHARoASSAMoSILCHARoPIN-o788001. 5:THEoSETTLEMENToOFFICER,oCACHARoANDoHAILAKANDIo DISTRICToSILCHARoCACHARoPIN-o788001. 6:THEoASSISTANToSETTLEMENToOFFICERoKATIGORAHoREVENUEoCIRCLEo KATIGORAHoDIST.-oCACHARoASSAMoPIN-o788805. 7:THEoDISTRICToFISHERIESoDEVELOPMENToOFFICER CACHARoSILCHARoASSAMoPIN-o788001o ForotheoApplicant(s)o :oMr.oS.D.oPurkayastha,oAdvocate.o Page No.# 2/3 For the Respondent(s) : Mr. T. Sk. Advocate for respondent No.1. : Ms. N. Bordoloi, Standing Counsel, Revenue Department for respondent No.2. : Mr. P. Sharmah, Standing Counsel, Fishery Department for respondent Nos.3 & 7. : Ms. R.B. Bora, Junior Government Advocate, Assam for respondent Nos.4, 5 & 6. – B E F O R E – HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. VIJAY BISHNOI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUMAN SHYAM

15.03.2024 (Vijay Bishnoi, CJ) The parties are represented through their respective counsel. The matter comes upon for consideration of the present interlocutory application preferred on behalf of the applicants/appellants with a prayer to condone the delay of 17 days in filling the connected appeal. The learned counsel appearing for the respondent No.1 has opposed this application. Having heard the learned counsel for the parties and after going through the contents of the interlocutory application, we deem it appropriate to allow the same. Hence, the interlocutory application is allowed. The delay of 17 days in filing the connected appeal is condoned. Registry is directed to register the connected appeal and list the same for admission after 3(three) weeks. The interlocutory application stands disposed of. JUDGE CHIEF JUSTICE Page No.# 3/3 Comparing Assistant