Shivdhari Yadav @ Shivdhari Ray v. Laxmi Devi Ray and Anr

ORDER Date : 27.11.2024

Heard Mr. R.K. Jain, learned counsel for the applicant. None appears for the respondents on call. The present application has been filed under Section 30(2) and (3) of Employees Compensation Act, 1923 r/w 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963 for condonation of delay of 389 days in preferring the connected appeal against the impugned judgment and award dated 28.11.2022 passed by the learned Commissioner Employees Compensation, Karmup(M), Guwahati in W.C. Case No. 61/2013. Mr. Jain, learned counsel for the applicant submits that the delay occurred in filing the connected appeal is not intentional. He further submits that the detailed ground of delay has also been explained in the petition. Under such backdrop, the learned counsel for the applicant has prayed that the delay in regard to the filling of the connected appeal may be condoned. Page No.# 3/3 As per track consignment report, notice has been served to the respondent Nos. 1 and 2. None has appeared to represent the respondents. I have considered the submissions made by the learned counsel for the applicant. Considering all, the delay of 389 days is hereby condoned. The Registry is directed to register the connected appeal and list it in admission column after two weeks. With the above observation, I/A stands disposed of. JUDGE Comparing Assistant

PageoNo.#o1/3 GAHC010037802024 ooooooo undefined ooooooooooooooo ooooooooooooooooTHEoGAUHATIoHIGHoCOURTo (HIGHoCOURToOFoASSAM,oNAGALAND,oMIZORAMoANDoARUNACHALoPRADESH)o CaseoNo.o:oI.A.(Civil)/715/2024o SHIVDHARIoYADAVo@oSHIVDHARIoRAYo S/OoLATEoCHHATHUoRAYo@oYADAV,o RESIDENToOFoJAGTIoJAMUNIYA,oPSoKOTUA,oDISToEASToCHAMPARAN,o BIHAR,o845432 VERSUSo LAXMIoDEVIoRAYoANDoANR.o W/OoSHRIoRAJUoRAYo RESIDENToOFoC/OoK.CoGOGOI,o HOUSEoNO.o6,oPOoBELTOLA,oGUWAHATIo781028,oDISToKAMRUPoMoASSAM 2:M/SoUNIVERSALoSOMPOoGENERALoINSURANCEoCO.oLTD. oBRANCHoOFFICEoATo6THoFLOOR oDANDIoTOWER oSWARAJoNAGAR oSARUMOTORIA oGUWAHATIo78100o AdvocateoforotheoPetitionerooooo:oMR.oRoKoJAIN,oMS.oJoBASUMATARY,TULIKAoBORAHo AdvocateoforotheoRespondento:o,oo oLinkedoCaseo:o SHIVDHARIoYADAVo@oSHIVDHARIoRAY Page No.# 2/3 VERSUS LAXMI DEVI RAY AND ANR. E ------------ Advocate for : MR. R K JAIN Advocate for : appearing for LAXMI DEVI RAY AND ANR. E BEFORE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE MALASRI NANDI