- Court
- High Court of Gauhati
- Decided
- 29 February 2024
- Bench
- Lanusungkum Jamir
- Case no.
- WP(C) 1131/2024
Judgment
PageoNo.#o1/3 GAHC010037882024 ooooooo ooooooooooooooo ooooooooooooooooTHEoGAUHATIoHIGHoCOURTo (HIGHoCOURToOFoASSAM,oNAGALAND,oMIZORAMoANDoARUNACHALoPRADESH)o CaseoNo.o:oWP(C)/1131/2024o ABINASHoDASo S/O-oKHAGENoDAS,oVILL-oRAJAKHAToBANEKUCHI,oP.O.oKHARSITHA,oP.S.o NALBARI,oDIST.-oNALBARI,oPIN-o781370 VERSUSo THEoSTATEoOFoASSAMoANDo5oORSo REPRESENTEDoBYoTHEoSECRETARYoTOoTHEoGOVT.oOFoASSAM,oDEPT.oOFo LANDoREVENUE,oDISPUR,oGUWAHATI-o6 2:THEoDISTRICToCOMMISSIONER oNALBARI oPIN-o781303 3:THEoADDITIONALoDISTRICToCOMMISSIONER oNALBARI oPIN-o781303 4:THEoSELECTIONoCOMMITTEE oREPRESENTEDoBYoTHEoADDITIONALoDEPUTYoCOMMISSIONER oMEMBERoSECRETARYo(SELECTIONoCOMMITTEE) oDIST.-oNALBARI oPIN-o781303 5:THEoCIRCLEoOFFICER oBANEKUCHIoREVENUEoCIRCLE oDIST.-oNALBARI oASSAM oPIN-o781303 6:AJIToCHANDRAoDEKA oS/O-oLATEoSURENoDEKA Page No.# 2/3 VILL-RAJAKHAT BANEKUCHI P.O. KHARSITHA P.S. AND DIST.- NALBARI ASSAM PIN-78137 Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. A ROSHID Advocate for the Respondent : SC, REVENUE BEFORE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE LANUSUNGKUM JAMIR
:: O R D E R :: 01-03-2024
Heard Ms. T. Begum, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. S. Dutta, learned standing counsel, Revenue Department, for respondent No. 1 and Mr. C.S. Hazarika, learned Government Advocate, for respondent Nos. 2, 3, 4 and 5. Pursuant to an advertisement dated 26-05-2022, inviting applications for 101 posts of Gaon Pradhan under Revenue Circle, district-Nalbari, the petitioner applied for the post of Gaon Pradhan of Lat No. 4, Rajakhat Banekuchi under the Banekuchi Revenue Circle by claiming to be the son of an ex-Gaonburah, Khagendra Nath Das. In the said advertisement, Clause-12 provides that family of ex-Gaonburah will be given preference and recommendation of Mouzadar will be considered. Accordingly, in terms of Clause-12 of the Advertisement dated 26-05-2022, the petitioner claims to have a superior claim over the private respondent No. 6. The further case of the petitioner is that he has been issued a certificate by the Mouzadar, Natun Dehar, Nalbari, certifying that he is the son of retired Gaon Pradhan of Rajakhat Banekuchi. Page No.# 3/3 Mr. S. Dutta, learned standing counsel, Revenue Department, submits that the Revenue and Disaster Management (LA&A) Department has issued a Notification on 01-02-2024 amending the Executive Instructions No. 162-C of the Executive Instructions under the Assam Land and Revenue Regulation, 1886 (Amendment) 2024. He submits that under the Executive Instruction No. 162-C an appeal against the order of appointment, suspension and dismissal of a Gaon Pradhan by the District Commissioner or by the Principal Secretary of the Autonomous Council area shall lie to the Director of Land Records and Surveys, Assam, within a period of 60 (sixty) days from the date of receipt of the copy of the order of appointment, suspension or dismissal as the case may be. After hearing the learned counsel for the parties and on consideration of the amendment of the Executive Instructions No. 162-C, this writ petition is disposed of directing the petitioner to file an appeal before the Director of Land Records and Surveys, Assam, under the Executive Instruction No. 162-C, within a period of 10 days from today. Thereafter, the Director of Land Records and Surveys, Assam, shall consider and dispose of the appeal as expeditiously as possible but not later than two months from the date of receipt of the appeal. With the above observations and directions, the instant writ petition is disposed of. JUDGE Comparing Assistant
Source: High Court of Gauhati, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.