- Court
- High Court of Gauhati
- Decided
- 8 April 2024
- Bench
- Parthivjyoti Saikia
- Case no.
- Bail Appln. 515/2024
Judgment
ORDER Date : 09.04.2024 Heard Mr. B. Das, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner. Also heard Page No.# 2/2 Ms. N. Das, learned Additional P.P. for the State of Assam. This is an application under Section 439 of the Cr.P.C. in respect of Special POCSO Case No. 11/2024 under Section 376(AB) of the Indian Penal Code read with Section 6 of the POCSO Act pending the Court of Additional Special Judge(POCSO), Barpeta. The petitioner has been charge-sheeted in a case under Section 376(AB) of the Indian Penal Code read with Section 6 of the POCSO Act. No witness has been examined till now by the trial Court. Let the trial Court examine the victim and the informant. After that, the bail prayer of the petitioner shall be considered. The present bail application is found not to be satisfactory. Therefore, the bail application of the petitioner is rejected and disposed of accordingly. JUDGE Comparing Assistant
Case details
Parties and counsel
Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010038482024 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Bail Appln./515/2024 KHARGAMANI LAHKAR S/O LATE HEMBURAM LAHKAR, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE NAMSALA, PS SARTHEBARI, DIST BARPETA, ASSAM VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ANR REPRESENTED BY PP ASSAM 2:SRI PARAG DEKA S/O LATE SANATAN DEKA RESIDENT OF VILLAGE NAMSALA PS SARTHEBARI DIST BARPETA ASSA Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. B. DAS Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHIVJYOTI SAIKIA
Source: High Court of Gauhati, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.