VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Gauhati High Court 2024 › High Court of Gauhati

Sayed Ahmed @ Sahid Ahmed v. Saleha Begum and 3 Ors

Disposed Of
Court
High Court of Gauhati
Decided
25 February 2024
Bench
Parthivjyoti Saikiaauthor
Case no.
CRP(IO) 81/2024

Judgment

ORDER

26.02.2024 Heard Mr. R Ali, learned counsel for the petitioner. This is an application under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the order dated 08.02.2024 passed by the learned Civil Judge (Junior Division), Sankardev Nagar, Hojai in Misc. (J) Case No. 20/2024 arising out of T.S. No. 156/2022. The petitioner is the defendant before the trial court in TS No. 156/2022. The plaintiff filed an injunction petition registered as Misc.(J) Case No. 25/2023, which is still pending and posted for hearing on 30.04.2024. But, in the meantime, the plaintiff filed another petition which was registered as Misc.(J) Case No. 20/2024. In that petition, the trial court directed the parties to maintain status quo in respect of the suit land without issuing notice to the defendant/petitioner. Being aggrieved by the aforesaid order of status quo, the present revision petition has been filed. I have considered the submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner. Since Misc.(J) Case No. 25/2023 is pending for hearing, the trial court should not have passed the impugned order in Misc. (J) Case No. 20/2024. Therefore, the impugned order asking the parties to maintain the status quo is set aside. The trial court is directed to hear the both sides in Misc. (J) Case No. 25/2023 first and thereafter, the court below shall proceed to dispose of the case in accordance with law. Page No.# 3/3 The revision petition is disposed of. JUDGE Comparing Assistant

Case details

Parties and counsel

PageoNo.#o1/3 GAHC010038942024 ooooooo ooooooooooooooo ooooooooooooooooTHEoGAUHATIoHIGHoCOURTo (HIGHoCOURToOFoASSAM,oNAGALAND,oMIZORAMoANDoARUNACHALoPRADESH)o CaseoNo.o:oCRP(IO)/81/2024o SAYEDoAHMEDo@oSAHIDoAHMEDo S/OoLATEoANJABoALIo RESIDENToOFoVILLAGEoHOJAIoCOLLEGEoROAD,oPO,oPSoANDoDISToHOJAI,o ASSAMo782435 VERSUSo SALEHAoBEGUMoANDo3oORSo W/OoLATEoALAoUDDINo RESIDENToOFoVILLAGEoROHINIoPATHER,oWARDoNO.o10,oMOUZAo KAPASHBARI,oPSoMURAJHAR,oDISToHOJAI,oASSAMo782439 2:JYSTNAoBEGUM oD/OoLATEoALAoUDDINo RESIDENToOFoVILLAGEoROHINIoPATHER oWARDoNO.o10 oMOUZAoKAPASHBARI oPSoMURAJHAR oDISToHOJAI oASSAMo782439 3:HASINAoBEUM oD/OoLATEoALAoUDDINo RESIDENToOFoVILLAGEoROHINIoPATHER oWARDoNO.o10 oMOUZAoKAPASHBARI oPSoMURAJHAR oDISToHOJAI oASSAMo782439 4:IMRANoHUSSAIN oS/OoLATEoALAoUDDINo Page No.# 2/3 RESIDENT OF VILLAGE ROHINI PATHER WARD NO. 10 MOUZA KAPASHBARI PS MURAJHAR DIST HOJAI ASSAM 78243 Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. R ALI Advocate for the Respondent : BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHIVJYOTI SAIKIA

Source: High Court of Gauhati, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.