- Court
- High Court of Gauhati
- Decided
- 17 March 2023
- Bench
- Achintya Malla Bujor Barua
- Case no.
- WP(C) 1257/2018
Judgment
ORDER Date : 17.03.2023 (AM Bujor Barua, J)
Heard Mr. MU Mondal, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Ms. L Devi, learned counsel for the respondents no. 1 and 4 being the authorities under the Union of India and NRC, Ms. A Verma, learned counsel for the respondents no. 2, 3, 5, 6, 8 and 10 being the Chief Secretary to the Government of Assam and the authorities under the Home Department, Ms. U Das, learned counsel for the respondents no. 7 and 9 being the Deputy Commissioner, Hojai and Mr. AI Ali, learned counsel for the respondent no. 11 being the authorities under the Election Commission of India.
¶2The petitioner Monowara Begum had been referred to the Foreigners' Tribunal No. 10, Nagaon for rendering an opinion as to whether she is a person who entered the State of Assam from the specified territory on or after
25.03.1971, resulting in registration of FT(D) Case No. 543/2015 wherein the Tribunal rendered its opinion dated 13.02.2017 holding the petitioner to be a foreigner.
¶3Being aggrieved, this writ petition is instituted.
¶4The petitioner refers to the voters' list of 1966 of village Jungle Block PS Jamunamukh in the Nagaon district which contains the name of Md. A. Hakim, S/O Rahim Uddin at Sl. No. 364. The petitioner claims that Md. A. Hakim is her father. To substantiate the claim the petitioner refers to the Kabin Nama of her marriage wherein Monowara Begum is stated to be the daughter of Abdul Page No.# 4/5 Hakim of village Jungle Block of Jamunamukh Mouza. Accordingly, the petitioner claims to have established that she is the daughter of Abdul Hakim of the 1966 voters' list of village Jungle Block.
¶5In the circumstance the matter stands remanded back to the Tribunal to examine the authenticity of the voters' list of 1966 of village Jungle Block as well as the Kabin Nama and upon considering the authenticity and examining the contents of two documents, to pass a reasoned order.
¶6A certificate of the Gaon Burah is also referred. But it is stated that the Gaon Burah had not been examined and without examination, the certificate on its own would not have any evidentiary value. However, if the petitioner desires that the Gaon Burah may be examined. The Gaon Burah to not merely reiterate the contents of the certificate but also to depose on the source of the knowledge as regards the contents of the certificate and upon the source of the knowledge being stated, the Tribunal shall examine and verify whether the source of the knowledge so stated has any reasonable proximity with the existence of the fact that is sought to be proved by the certificate.
¶7Any reasoned order be passed by the Tribunal may prevail over the opinion dated 13.02.2017 passed in FT(D) Case No. 543/2015. The petitioner to appear before the Tribunal on 21.04.2023.
¶8Till such reasoned order is passed, no coercive action be taken against the petitioner in respect of the opinion dated 13.02.2017 in FT(D) Case No. 543/2015.
Writ petition stands disposed of in the above terms.
JUDGE JUDGE Page No.# 5/5 Comparing Assistant
Case details
Parties and counsel
PageoNo.#o1/5 GAHC010039812018 ooooooo ooooooooooooooo ooooooooooooooooTHEoGAUHATIoHIGHoCOURTo (HIGHoCOURToOFoASSAM,oNAGALAND,oMIZORAMoANDoARUNACHALoPRADESH)o CaseoNo.o:oWP(C)/1257/2018o MONOWARAoBEGUMo W/O-oMOHORoALI,oD/O-oLATEoABDULoHAKIM@oABDULoHEKIM,oR/O-oVILL-o MIKIRATIoHOWoGAON,oP.O-oDOBOKA,oP.S-oDOBOKA,oDIST-oHOJAI,oASSAM,o PIN-o782440 VERSUSo THEoUNIONoOFoINDIAoANDo10oORS.o REP.oBYoTHEoMINoOFoHOMEoAFFAIRS,oGOVToOFoINDIA,oNEWoDELHI-o01 2:THEoSTATEoOFoASSAM oREP.oBYoCHIEFoSECRETARYoTOoTHEoGOVToOFoASSAM oDISPUR oGHY-o06 3:THEoCOMMISSIONERoANDoSECRETARYoTOoTHEoGOVToOFoASSAM oHOMEoDEPTT. oDISPUR oGHY-o06 4:THEoSTATEoCO-ORDINATOR oNRC oASSAM oBHANGAGARH oGHY-o05 5:THEoDIRECTORoGENERALoOFoPOLICE oASSAM oULUBARI oGUWAHATI-o05 6:THEoSUPERINTENDENToOFoPOLICE(B) Page No.# 2/5 HOJAI DIST- HOJAI ASSAM PIN- 782440 7:THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER HOJAI DIST- HOJAI ASSAM PIN- 782440 8:THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE(B) HOJAI DIST- HOJAI ASSAM PIN- 782440 9:THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER HOJAI DIST- HOJAI ASSAM PIN- 782440 10:THE OFFICER-IN-CHARGE DOBOKA POLICE STATION DIST- HOJAI ASSAM PIN- 782440 11:THE ELECTORAL REGISTRATION OFFICER NO. 90 JAMUNAMUKH LAC DIST- HOJAI ASSAM PIN- 78244 Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. M U MONDAL Advocate for the Respondent : ASSTT.S.G.I. Page No.# 3/5 BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ACHINTYA MALLA BUJOR BARUA HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ROBIN PHUKAN
Source: High Court of Gauhati, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.