VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Gauhati High Court 2024 › High Court of Gauhati

Habibur Rahman and Anr v. The State of Assam

Disposed Of
Court
High Court of Gauhati
Decided
28 February 2024
Bench
S. Justice Malasri Nandiauthor
Case no.
AB 503/2024

Judgment

PageoNo.#o1/3 GAHC010040232024 ooooooo ooooooooooooooo ooooooooooooooooTHEoGAUHATIoHIGHoCOURTo (HIGHoCOURToOFoASSAM,oNAGALAND,oMIZORAMoANDoARUNACHALoPRADESH)o CaseoNo.o:oAB/503/2024o HABIBURoRAHMANoANDoANR.o S/OoHANIFoALIo R/OoBALBARI,o P.O.oBAR-SATRA,oP.S.oDHULAo DIST.oDARRANG,oASSAM 2:oGOLAPoHUSSAIN oS/OoHASENoALIo R/OoVILLoANDoP.O.oDAIPAMo P.S.oBECHIMARIo DIST.oDARRANG oASSAMo PIN-781121o MOBILEoNO.o9864027090o VERSUSo THEoSTATEoOFoASSAMo REPoBYoTHEoLEARNEDoPP,oASSAM AdvocateoforotheoPetitionerooooo:oMRoAoKoAHMEDo AdvocateoforotheoRespondento:oPP,oASSAMoo oooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo BEFORE HONOURABLEkMRS.kJUSTICEkMALASRIkNANDI Page No.# 2/3

29.02.2024

Heard Mr. AK Ahmed, learned counsel for the petitioners. Also heard Mr. BB Gogoi, learned Additional Public Prosecutor, Assam for the State respondents. This is an application under Section 438 Cr.P.C. for granting the privilege of pre-arrest bail to the petitioners, namely, 1. Habibur Rahman and 2. Golap Hussain, who are apprehending arrest in connection with Basistha P.S. Case No.60/2024 under Sections 379 IPC read with Section 11(1)(d) of Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act, 1960 read with Section 13(1)/16 of the Assam Cattle Preservation Act, 2021. The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are no where connected with the offence alleged. The petitioner No.1 is the owner of the vehicle bearing Registration No.AS26-AC-0482 and the petitioner No.2 is the owner of the cattles which were recovered from the said vehicle. According to the learned counsel for the petitioners, the petitioner No.2 has purchased the cattles in question and has produced the relevant purchase receipt, as such, the cattles were handed over to the petitioner No.2 and the vehicle was also given zimma to the petitioner No.1, being the owner as per the order of the learned trial court. Under such backdrop, it is prayed that the petitioners may be extended the benefit of pre-arrest bail. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor, Assam has submitted that the matter may be disposed of as the petitioners have submitted all relevant documents regarding the ownership of the vehicle, in question, and purchase of the cattles. I have perused the averments made in the application and also considered the submissions of the learned counsel for the parties. In view of the above, this Court is inclined to grant the privilege of pre-arrest bail to the petitioners. Accordingly, the petitioners shall appear before the Investigating Police Officer within a period of 10 (ten) days from today, and, in the event of arrest of the petitioners above-named, in connection with the case aforementioned, they Page No.# 3/3 shall be released on bail on furnishing a bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) each with one suitable surety of the like amount to the satisfaction of arresting authority. Bail application, accordingly, stands disposed of.

JUDGE Comparing Assistant

Source: High Court of Gauhati, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.