VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Gauhati High Court 2024 › High Court of Gauhati

Prabin Malakar and 3 Ors v. The State of Assam

Disposed Of
Court
High Court of Gauhati
Decided
21 May 2024
Bench
S. Justice Susmita Phukan Khaundauthor
Case no.
AB 539/2024

Judgment

ORDER Date : 22-05-2024

¶1Heard learned Senior Counsel Mr. T.J. Mahanta for the petitioners assisted by learned counsel Ms. T. Som. Also heard learned Addl. PP Mr. D. Das and learned counsel Mr. B.K. Mahajan for the informant.

¶2This is an application under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, praying for grant of pre-arrest bail to the accused/petitioners, namely, [1] Prabin Malakar [2] Anil Malakar [3] Ajit Malakar and [4] Dipul Malakar who are apprehending arrest in connection with Hajo P.S. Case No. 55/2024, under Sections 341/326/325/379/3 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶3The allegation against the petitioners is that they trespassed into the land of the informant and tried to erect a post outside the boundary of his land. When the informant tried to resist, the petitioner No. 2, Anil Malakar at the behest of the other petitioners dealt a blow with an iron rod on the informant's head causing grievous injuries on his head. The petitioner No. 2 also caused other injuries on the informant and snatched away the helmet with Rs. 30,000/-. The petitioner Nos. 1, 3 and 4 were already granted interim bail vide order dated 04.03.2024.

¶4I have scrutinised the Case Diary and the pictures of the head injury of the informant. I have also perused the Medical Report of the victim. The petitioner No. 2 was not granted interim bail. I have considered the Case Diary and the submissions at the Bar with circumspection. The petitioner Nos. 1, 3 and 4 have appeared before the IO and their statements have been recorded. The petitioners are willing to co-operate with the investigation. Page No.# 3/3

¶5Considering all aspects, the interim order dated 04.03.2024 so far the petitioner Nos. [1] Prabin Malakar [3] Ajit Malakar and [4] Dipul Malakar are concerned is hereby made absolute. The prayer for pre-arrest bail by petitioner No. 2 Anil Malakar as per Section 438 of the Cr.PC is hereby rejected.

¶6The petitioners are also directed to refrain from such activities with which they are alleged, failing which bail order shall stand cancelled. Send back the Case Diary.

JUDGE Comparing Assistant

Case details

Parties and counsel

PageoNo.#o1/3 GAHC010042462024 ooooooo ooooooooooooooo ooooooooooooooooTHEoGAUHATIoHIGHoCOURTo (HIGHoCOURToOFoASSAM,oNAGALAND,oMIZORAMoANDoARUNACHALoPRADESH)o CaseoNo.o:oAB/539/2024o PRABINoMALAKARoANDo3oORSo S/O-oSONARAMoMALAKAR,oVILL-oBHOMARBODI,oP.S.oHAJO,oDIST.-o KAMRUP,oPIN-o781104 2:oANILoMALAKAR oS/O-oRATIRAMoMALAKAR oR/O-oNO-1oKULHATIoP.S.oHAJO oPIN-o781104 3:oAJIToMALAKAR oS/O-oRATIRAMoMALAKAR oR/O-oNO-1oKULHATIoP.S.oHAJO oPIN-o781104 4:oDIPULoMALAKAR oS/O-oKESHABoMALAKAR oR/O-oNO-1oKULHATIoP.S.oHAJO oDIST.-oKAMRUP oPIN-o78110o VERSUSo THEoSTATEoOFoASSAMo REPoBYoTHEoPPoASSAM AdvocateoforotheoPetitionerooooo:oMS.oToSOMo AdvocateoforotheoRespondento:oPP,oASSAMoo oooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo BEFORE Page No.# 2/3 HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE SUSMITA PHUKAN KHAUND

Source: High Court of Gauhati, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.