VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Gauhati High Court 2024 › High Court of Gauhati

Chaddam Hussain @ Saddam Hussain and Anr v. The State of Assam

Disposed Of
Court
High Court of Gauhati
Decided
30 April 2024
Bench
S. Justice Malasri Nandiauthor
Case no.
AB 537/2024

Judgment

ORDER Date : 01.05.2024

Heard Mr. T. Chutia, learned counsel for the petitioners. Also heard Mr. R.R. Kaushik, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the Page No.# 2/3 State of Assam. This is an application made under Section 438 Cr.P.C., seeking pre-arrest bail by the petitioners, namely, Chaddam Hussain @ Saddam Hussain and Rahmat Ali, apprehending arrest in connection with Basistha P.S. Case No. 92/2024, registered under Section 379/34 IPC r/w Section 11(1)(d) of Prevention of Cruelty to Animal Act, 1960 and r/w Section 13(1)/16 of Assam Cattle Preservation Act, 2021. Mr. Chutia, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have appeared before the Investigating Police Officer as per direction of this Court and their statements have already been recorded after they were granted interim protection. They have not misused the liberty granted to them; rather, they co-operate with the investigation of the case. Therefore, the privilege of pre-arrest bail granted to the petitioners may be made absolute. Mr. Kaushik, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State submits that the petitioners may appear before the investigating officer as and when called for. As the statement of petitioners have already been recorded by the investigating officer and as such, their custodial interrogation may not be required. I have considered the submission made by the learned counsel for the parties and also perused the case diary. It appears that the petitioners have not misused the liberty granted to them while availing interim protection. It is directed to the petitioners to appear before the investigating officer as and when called for. Page No.# 3/3 Considering all, this Court is of the view that the petitioners deserve to be granted the privilege of pre-arrest bail. Accordingly, the interim protection granted to the petitioners vide order dated 04.03.2024, is made absolute on the same terms and conditions, as reflected. The petition stands disposed of accordingly. Return the case diary. JUDGE Comparing Assistant

Case details

Parties and counsel

Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010043372024 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : AB/537/2024 CHADDAM HUSSAIN @ SADDAM HUSSAIN AND ANR S/O- KUDDUCH ALI, VILL- NAZAN, P.S. JAKHALABANDHA, DISTRICT- NAGAON, ASSAM 2: RAHMAT ALI S/O- SURUJ ALI VILL- KHALIHAMARI PASCHIM P.S. SAMAGURI DISTRICT- NAGAON ASSA VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM REPRESENTED BY P.P., ASSAM Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. T CHUTIA Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM BEFORE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE MALASRI NANDI

Source: High Court of Gauhati, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.