- Court
- High Court of Gauhati
- Decided
- 5 March 2024
- Bench
- The Chief Justice, Suman Shyam
- Case no.
- WA 73/2024
Judgment
ORDER
06.03.2024 (Vijay
Bishnoi, CJ) This intra-Court appeal is filed on behalf of the appellants being aggrieved with the order dated 02.02.2024 whereby the writ petition filed on behalf of the appellants is dismissed on the ground of concealment of material facts. The learned Single Judge while dismissing the writ petition has imposed a cost of Rs.25,000/- on the appellants. The learned counsel for the appellants has submitted that he is not challenging the impugned order on merit but is only aggrieved by the direction passed by the learned Single Judge of imposing a cost of Rs.25,000/- upon the appellants. The learned counsel has submitted that the appellants ought to have disclosed the material facts before the learned Single Judge. It is submitted that the fact regarding filing of earlier writ petitions could not be brought into the notice of the learned Single Judge due to bonafide mistake and the appellants had no intention to mislead the Court. It is also submitted that the appellants are poor persons and based on the legal advice had preferred the writ petition. The learned counsel has, therefore, prayed that the costs imposed by the learned Single Judge be made easy. The learned counsel appearing for the respondents has opposed the request Page No.# 6/6 made by the learned counsel for the appellants to make the cost imposed by the learned Single Judge easy. Having heard the learned counsel for the parties and particularly taking into consideration the fact that the appellants are poor persons, we deem it appropriate to interfere with the impugned order upto the extent of imposing a cost of Rs.25,000/. Resultantly, the cost imposed by the learned Single Judge of Rs.25,000/- vide impugned judgment is made easy. We want to clarify that we have not passed any order on merits and have also not interfered with the impugned order except the imposition of cost. The Writ Appeal stands disposed of.
JUDGE CHIEF JUSTICE Comparing Assistant
Case details
Parties and counsel
PageoNo.#o1/6 GAHC010046772024 ooooooo ooooooooooooooo ooooooooooooooooTHEoGAUHATIoHIGHoCOURTo (HIGHoCOURToOFoASSAM,oNAGALAND,oMIZORAMoANDoARUNACHALoPRADESH)o CaseoNo.o:oWA/73/2024o SWAPANoMAJUMDARoANDo14oORSo AGEDoABOUT51oYEARSoSONoOFoLATEoSAMACHARANoMAJUMDARo (FATHER)oANDoSMTI.oGITARANIoMAJUMDARo(MOTHER)oRESIDENTSoOFo PUKHURIPAR,oWARDoNO.3,oMARIANIoTOWN,oP.OoANDoP.S.-oMARAIANI,o DIST.-JORHAT,oASSAM 2:oGOPALoDUTTA oAGEDoABOUTo43oYEARSo SONoOFoSUBHASHoDUTTAo RESIDENTSoOFoPUKHURIPAR oWARDoNO.3 oMARIANIoTOWN o o 3:oSAJIDoALIo@oMAINULoALI oAGEDoABOUTo46oYEARSo SONoOFoABUTALIBo RESIDENTSoOFoPUKHURIPAR oWARDoNO.3 oMARIANIoTOWN o o 4:oARCHANAoRANIoBHADRA oAGEDoABOUTo65oYEARSo WIFEoOFoLATEoNIHARoKANTIoBHADRA o PageoNo.#o2/6 RESIDENTSoOFoRAILWAYoCOLONY o WARDoNO.o5 oMARIANIoTOWN o o 5:oSUDHARSANoBISWASo@oSHYAMALoBISWAS oAGEo44oYEARSo SONoOFoRANJIToBISWASHo RESIDENTSoOFoRIFIUJIoCOLONY o o 6:oNARAYANoPALo@oTANKUoPAL oAGEDoABOUTo61oYEARSo SONoOFoAJAJoKUoPALo RESIDENTSoOFoPUKHURIPAR oWARDoNO.3 oMARIANIoTOWN o o 7:oADHIRoDEY oAGEDoABOUTo62oYEARSo SONoOFoSURENDRALALoDEYo RESIDENTSoOFoNATUNMATI o o 8:oINDRAJIToSAIKIAo@oINDRAoSAIKIA oAGEDoABOUT47oYEARSo SONoOFoPUNESWARoSAIKIAo RESIDENTSoOFoKATHKOTIA o PageoNo.#o3/6 o 9:oSUBIRoSEN oAGEDoABOUTo37oYEARSo SONoOFoJHANTUoSENo RESIDENTSoOFoRAILWAYoCOLONYoWARD o o 10:oSRIoDIGANTAoBORAH oAGEDoABOUTo49oYEARSo SONoOFoLAKSHINATHoBORAo RESIDENTSoOFoNATUNoMATI o o 11:oARATIoACHARJEE oAGEDoABOUTo65oYEARSo WIFEoOFoNANIoGOPALoACHERJEEo RESIDENToOFoNATUNoMATI oWARDoNO.o4 oMARIANIoTOWNo o 12:oMINTUoGHOSH oAGEDoABOUTo49oYEARSo SONoOFoLATEoNANIGOPALoGHOSHo RESIDENTSoOFoNATUNoMATI o o 13:oASHISHoNATH oAGEDoABOUTo47oYEARSo SONoJIBANoKRISHNAoNATHo PageoNo.#o4/6 RESIDENTSoOFoNATUNoMATI o o 14:oBIJUoMAHAJAN oAGEDoABOUTo35oYEARSo SONoOFoSHANKARoMAHAJANo RESIDENToOFoSHANKARDEBoCOLONY o o 15:oSRIoSUKUMARoDEY oAGEDoABOUTo49oYEARS o SONoOFoSUDHANSUoDEY o RESIDENToOFoKALIBARI o o oASSAo VERSUSo THEoNORTHoEASToFRONTIERoRAILWAYoANDo3oORSo REPRESENTEDoHEREINoBYoTHEoGENERALoMANAGER,oMALIGAON,o GUWAHATI,oASSAM-o781011 2:THEoASSISTANToDIVISIONALoENGINEER oN.oF.oRAILWAY oMARIANI-785634 3:THEoESTATEoOFFICER oN.oF.oRAILWAY oTINSUKIA oASSAM-786125 4:THEoDIVISIONALoMANAGER oN.oF.oRAILWAY oTINSUKIA oASSAM-78612o Page No.# 5/6 Advocate for the Petitioner : MR S BORTHAKUR Advocate for the Respondent : DY.S.G.I. BEFORE HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUMAN SHYAM
Source: High Court of Gauhati, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.