- Court
- High Court of Gauhati
- Decided
- 10 March 2024
- Bench
- Michael Zothankhuma
- Case no.
- WP(C) 1343/2024
Judgment
ORDER Date : 11.03.2024
Heard Mrs. K.K. Choudhury, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Ms. M. Barman, learned counsel appearing on behalf of Ms. A. Gayan, learned CGC appearing for the respondent No.1 and Ms. A. Lodha, learned counsel for the respondent Nos. 2 to 6.
¶2The petitioner's case is that her husband was a registered contractor with the Water Resources Department, Nagaon. The petitioner's husband was given various work contracts under the Scheme of "R/S to T/dyke Along Both Banks of Kopilli River From Charaihagi to Tuklaitup (L/B), Basundhari to Killing Kopilli Junction (L/B) and Chaparmukh Ahatguri Amsoi P.W.D. Road (R/B) Including Ante-Erosion Measures at Different Reaches."
¶3Though the petitioner's husband had completed the work contracts and was paid a certain sum of money, the balance amount of Rs.12,88,042/- has not been paid to the petitioner's husband, who expired on 25.07.2021.
¶4The petitioner's counsel submits that the Executive Engineer, Nagaon W.R. Division, vide letter No. A/2/12/A/Pt-1/693 dated 29.07.2022, has furnished the liability statement issuing the outstanding amount liability towards the petitioner's husband, i.e., Rs.12,88,042/-. The petitioner's counsel submits that Page No.# 3/4 that the present case is covered by the order dated 27.09.2022 passed by this Court in WP(C) No. 4734/2021 (Nazim Hussain Vs. The State of Assam and 8 Ors.). She accordingly submits that a similar direction, as given in the above case, be issued in this case.
¶5Ms. A. Gayan, learned CGC appearing for the respondent No.1 and Ms. R. Deka, learned counsel for the respondent Nos. 2-6 submit that they have got no objection to the prayer made by the petitioner's counsel.
¶6I have heard the learned counsels for the parties.
¶7This Court, in a series of cases, leading case being WP(C) 4734/2021 (Nazim Hussain -vs-The State of Assam and 8 others), while disposing of the similar matters, had passed the following direction, which are as follows:- "(1) Within 15 (fifteen) days from today, the concerned official of the State Government of Assam will communicate the supplementary budget passed in the last Assembly Session pertaining to the scheme to the competent authority of the Ministry of Jal Shakti, Government of India.
(2) Within 60 (sixty) days from the date of receipt of such communication, the Ministry of Jal Shakti to release the amount due under the schemes to the concerned Department of the Government of Assam.
(3) Upon receipt of the amount, bills of the writ petitioners shall be processed and cleared within a further period of 45 days"
¶8In view of the consent of the parties and in view of the liability statement Page No.# 4/4 attached to the letter No. A/2/12/A/Pt-1/693 dated 29.07.2022, issued by the Executive Engineer, Nagaon W.R. Division, this Court is of the view that this writ petition can be disposed of at the motion stage itself.
¶9In view of there being an admission made by the respondent No. 5, the respondent No. 3 is directed to re-verify and thereafter take a decision with regard to whether the amount claimed by the petitioner is as per records. In the event, the respondent No. 3 comes to a decision that the amount claimed is an admitted amount, the direction passed in WP(C)4734/2021, which has been enumerated above, shall be complied with. The respondents shall thereafter complete the entire process, within a period of 5 (five) months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.
¶10This writ petition is accordingly disposed of.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant
Case details
Parties and counsel
PageoNo.#o1/4 GAHC010046982024 ooooooo ooooooooooooooo ooooooooooooooooTHEoGAUHATIoHIGHoCOURTo (HIGHoCOURToOFoASSAM,oNAGALAND,oMIZORAMoANDoARUNACHALoPRADESH)o CaseoNo.o:oWP(C)/1343/2024o DEEPALIoBORAo@oDIPALIoBORAo W/O-oLATEoSARAToCH.oBORA,oVILL.-oCHOTAHAIBORoCT,oP.O.o HAIBORGAON,oP.S.oSADAR,oDIST.oNAGAON,oASSAM,oPIN-o781305. VERSUSo UNIONoOFoINDIAoANDo5oORSo MINISTRYoOFoJALoSHAKTIoE-GOVERNANCEoCELL,o6THoFLOORoCABIN,o SHRAMoSHAKTIoBHAWAN,oRAFIoMARG,oNEWoDELHI-110001. 2:THEoSTATEoOFoASSAM oREPRESENTEDoBYoTHEoSECRETARYoTOoTHEoGOVERNMENToOFoASSAM oWATERoRESOURCESoDEPARTMENT oDISPURoGHY-6. 3:THEoCHIEFoENGINEER oWATERoRESOURCESoDEPARTMENT oASSAMoBASISTHAoGHY-29. 4:THEoSUPERINTENDENToENGINEER oNAGAONoWATERoRESOURCESoCIRCLE oNAGAON-782001. 5:THEoEXECUTIVEoENGINEER oNAGAONoWATERoRESOURCEoDIVISION oNAGAONoPIN-o782001. 6:THEoASSISTANToEXECUTIVEoENGINEER oRAHA oWRoSUB-oDIVISION oRAHA oPIN-o782103 oASSAo Page No.# 2/4 Advocate for the Petitioner : MRS. K K CHOUDHURY Advocate for the Respondent : DY.S.G.I. BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MICHAEL ZOTHANKHUMA
Source: High Court of Gauhati, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.