VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Gauhati High Court 2024 › High Court of Gauhati

Jumma Khan v. The State of Assam

Disposed Of
Court
High Court of Gauhati
Decided
24 April 2024
Bench
S. Justice Malasri Nandiauthor
Case no.
AB 579/2024

Judgment

ORDER Date : 25.04.2024

Heard Mr. J. Laskar, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. R.R. Kaushik, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State of Assam. This is an application made under Section 438 Cr.P.C., seeking pre-arrest bail by the petitioner, namely, Jumma Khan, apprehending Page No.# 3/4 arrest in connection with Umrangso P.S. Case No. 01/2024(corresponding to G.R. Case No. 27/2024), registered under Section 120(B)/384/420/34 IPC r/w Section 20/21 of Assam Micro Finance Institutions (Regulation of Money Lending) Act, 2020. Mr. Laskar, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has appeared before the Investigating Police Officer as per direction of this Court and his statement has already been recorded after he was granted interim protection. He has not misused the liberty granted to him; rather, he co-operates with the investigation of the case. Therefore, the privilege of pre-arrest bail granted to the petitioner may be made absolute. Mr. Kaushik, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State submits that the petitioner may appear before the investigating officer as and when called for. As the statement of petitioner has already been recorded by the investigating officer and as such, his custodial interrogation may not be required. I have considered the submission made by the learned counsel for the parties and also perused the case diary. It appears that the petitioner has not misused the liberty granted to him while availing interim protection. It is directed to the petitioner to appear before the investigating officer as and when called for. Considering all, this Court is of the view that the petitioner deserves to be granted the privilege of pre-arrest bail. Accordingly, the interim protection granted to the petitioner vide order dated 06.03.2024, is made absolute on the same terms and Page No.# 4/4 conditions, as reflected. The petition stands disposed of accordingly. Return the case diary. JUDGE Comparing Assistant

Case details

Parties and counsel

PageoNo.#o1/4 GAHC010258502023 ooooooo ooooooooooooooo ooooooooooooooooTHEoGAUHATIoHIGHoCOURTo (HIGHoCOURToOFoASSAM,oNAGALAND,oMIZORAMoANDoARUNACHALoPRADESH)o CaseoNo.o:oAB/3905/2023o DHANAKANWAoLAKRAo@oPASCALoURANGoANDo5oORSo S/OoSILASoLAKRAo R/Oo18oNO.oLINE,o TONGANAoT.E.o P.O.oANDoP.S.oTONGANAo DIST.oTINSUKIA,oASSAM 2:oSRIoALIUSoURANG oS/OoTHADIUSoURANGo R/Oo18oNO.oLINE o TONGANAoT.E.o P.O.oANDoP.S.oTONGANAo DIST.oTINSUKIA oASSAM 3:oSRIoSILBANUSoURANG oS/OoLT.oATHANUSoURANGo R/Oo18oNO.oLINE o TONGANAoT.E.o P.O.oANDoP.S.oTONGANAo DIST.oTINSUKIA oASSAM 4:oSRIoANGALUoURANG oS/OoCIRLOoURANGo R/Oo18oNO.oLINE o TONGANAoT.E.o P.O.oANDoP.S.oTONGANAo DIST.oTINSUKIA oASSAM Page No.# 2/4 5: SRI JUDGE LAKRA @ GEORGE LAKRA S/O RIJUWAL LAKRA R/O 18 NO. LINE TONGANA T.E. P.O. AND P.S. TONGANA DIST. TINSUKIA ASSAM 6: SRI ARUN URANG S/O JOSEP LAKRA R/O 18 NO. LINE TONGANA T.E. P.O. AND P.S. TONGANA DIST. TINSUKIA ASSA VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM REP. BY THE PP, ASSAM Advocate for the Petitioner : MS. D GHOSH Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM BEFORE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE MALASRI NANDI

Source: High Court of Gauhati, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.