- Court
- High Court of Gauhati
- Decided
- 19 March 2024
- Bench
- Kaushik Goswami
- Case no.
- AB 602/2024
Judgment
Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010047922024
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : AB/602/2024 MD. OMAR ALI @ OMAR ALI S/O SOFER UDDIN, R/O VILL-DHALAGASA, P.O. AND P.S.-MERERCHAR, DIST-BONGAIGAON, ASSAM, PIN-783384 (PERMANENT ADDRESS) VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ANR REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, ASSAM 2:KADAM ALI S/O AMIR HUSSAIN R/O VILL-GHORAMARA PT. 1 P.O. AND P.S.-MERERCHAR DIST-BONGAIGAON ASSAM PIN-78338 Advocate for the Petitioner : MR G CHAMUAH Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM
B E F O R E HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KAUSHIK GOSWAMI
20.03.2024
Heard Mr. G. Chamuah, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner. Page No.# 2/3 Also heard Mr. P. Borthakur, learned Addl. P.P., Assam appearing for the State respondent.
¶2This is an application under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 for granting anticipatory bail to the petitioner, namely Md. Omar Ali @ Omar Ali, in connection with Mererchar P.S. Case No. 75/2020, registered under Sections 448/376/511/323/34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, corresponding to PRC Case No. 932/2021 pending before the S.D.J.M. (M), North Salmara at Abhayapuri.
¶3The case of the prosecution in brief is that on 08.08.2020, while the informant was absent at home, the petitioner along with co-accused entered his home and tried to commit rape on his wife.
¶4Mr. G. Chamuah, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the investigation is completed and charge-sheet has been filed and the petitioner is willing to co-operate in the trial.
¶5Mr. P. Borthakur, learned Addl. P.P. on the other hand opposes the prayer of anticipatory bail.
¶6I have heard the submissions made at the Bar and perused the materials available on record.
¶7It appears that the investigation has been completed and charge-sheet has been filed. Further, it appears that summon has also been issued to the petitioner 21.12.2023 for his appearance before the Court of SDJM(M), North Salmara, at Abhayapuri.
¶8Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, it is provided that in the event of arrest, the petitioner named above, shall be released on pre-arrest bail in connection with the above noted case, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. Page No.# 3/3 30,000/-with one surety of like amount to the satisfaction of the SDJM(M), North Salmara, at Abhayapuri, subject to the following conditions-
(i) That the petitioner shall appear before the SDJM(M), North Salmara, at Abhayapuri on all date fixed from time to time; and
(ii) That the petitioner shall not, directly or indirectly, make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer, and that the petitioner shall refrain from such activities with which he has alleged.
(iii) That the petitioner shall refrain from such activities from which he is alleged.
¶10Return the case diary.
¶11This disposes of anticipatory bail application.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant
Source: High Court of Gauhati, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.