- Court
- High Court of Gauhati
- Decided
- 20 June 2024
- Bench
- Kaushik Goswami
- Case no.
- AB 644/2024
Judgment
ORDER
21.06.2024
Heard Mr. A. Das, learned counsel for the petitioner. Mr. B. Sarma, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State respondent. This is an application under Section 438 of Cr.P.C, 1973 for seeking pre-arrest bail to the petitioner, i.e. Sintu Ali, who is apprehending arrest in Page No.# 2/3 connection with Chandmari PS Case No. 48/2024 registered under Sections 120(B)/143/384 /354(A) /354(C)/506 of IPC. Case diary as called for has been placed before this Court. Pertinent that by order dated 18.03.2024, the petitioner has been granted interim pre-arrest bail subject to conditions. Mr. B. Sarma, learned Additional Public Prosecutor submits that the petitioner has appeared before the Investigating Officer in terms of the order dated 18.03.2024 passed earlier by this Court and his statement has also been recorded under Section 161 of Cr.P.C. He further submits that the petitioner is co-operating in the investigation and there is no adverse antecedents reported by the IO as regards the petitioner. Considering the totality of the circumstances, this Court is of the considered view that custodial interrogation of the petitioner may not be justified for the ongoing investigation. Accordingly the interim pre-arrest bail granted by this Court by order dated
18.03.2024 is hereby made absolute subject of course to the following conditions:-
(i) That the petitioner shall co-operate with the investigation.
(ii) That the petitioner shall not, directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any Police Officer; and
(iii) That the petitioner shall refrain from committing any similar offences in Page No.# 3/3 future of which he is accused or suspected of commission. With the above observations and directions, the Anticipatory Bail Application stands disposed of.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant
Case details
Parties and counsel
Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010049332024 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case : AB/644/2024 SINTU ALI S/O SAHER ALI RESIDENT OF UKHURA PO BARAMBOI PS HAJO DIST KAMRUP ASSAM 781104 VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM REPRESENTED BY PP ASSAM ------------ Advocate for : MR. A CHETIA Advocate for : PP ASSAM appearing for THE STATE OF ASSAM BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KAUSHIK GOSWAMI
Source: High Court of Gauhati, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.