VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Gauhati High Court 2023 › High Court of Gauhati

Md. Saibar Rahman v. The State of Assam,

Disposed Of
Court
High Court of Gauhati
Decided
3 April 2023
Bench
Ajit Borthakurauthor
Case no.
I.A.(Crl.) 184/2023

Judgment

ORDER

03.04.2023

Heard Mr. Z. Kamar, learned Sr. Counsel appearing for the applicant accused. Also heard Mr. M. Phukan, learned Public Prosecutor, Assam appearing for the State respondent.

¶2By this interlocutory application under Section 439(1)(b) read with Section 482 of the Cr.P.C., the applicant has prayed for modification/waive of the condition Nos. (a), (b) and (e) incorporated in Paragraph No. 23 of the bail order, dated 23.06.2022, passed in Bail Appln. No. 3384/2021.

¶3The conditions contained in the order, dated 23.06.2022, passed in Bail Appln. No. 3384/2021 are extracted hereinbelow- "The direction for bail is further subject to the conditions that the accused-petitioner: "(a) shall not leave the territorial jurisdiction of the learned Special Judge, Assam, without prior written permission from him;

(b) shall inform the learned Special Judge, Assam as and when he leaves Guwahati and particulars of the places that he may visit. Page No.# 3/4

(c) shall not tamper with the evidence of the case;

(d) shall not, directly or indirectly, make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer; and

(e) shall deposit his passport/visa, etc, if any, in the learned court below."

¶4It is a case related to Gaonburah recruitment scam and corruption of several crores of rupees in South Salmara district of Assam by way of gratification.

¶5Mr. Z. Kamar, learned Sr. Counsel appearing for the applicant accused, submits that pursuant to the order, dated 23.06.2022, passed in Bail Appln. No. 3384/2021, the applicant accused submitted his passport before the Court of learned Special Judge, Assam, Guwahati and he has been regularly appearing before the learned Trial Court without any default. Mr. Kamar submits that the applicant accused is willing to go on pilgrimage to Saudi Arabia to perform Umrah Hajj along with his family members in the last part of March, 2023 and first part of April, 2023 for which, he needs his Passport to book his air tickets and apply for VISA. Mr. Kamar, learned Sr. Counsel, also submits that as the applicant's son is studying MBBS in Moscow, Russia and the applicant being a high diabetic and heart patient, he needs to visit Russia and outside the State very frequently to meet his son as well as for his medical treatments. Apart from this, Mr. Kamar submits, the applicant being a Government servant, he has to visit various districts regularly as well as to collect his movable and immovable property records for the disproportionate assets Case being Special Case No.39/2022, pending in the Court of learned Special Judge, Assam. Mr. Kamar, therefore, submits that the aforesaid condition Nos. (a), (b) and (e) may be relaxed and modified suitably.

¶6Mr. M. Phukan, learned Public Prosecutor, has raised strong objection Page No.# 4/4 against the prayer for modification of the bail conditions on the ground of the instant case being a serious one involving public interest and large scale corruption in the matter of recruitment of Gaonburah and his disproportionate assets.

¶7After hearing the learned counsel of both sides and considering the grounds cited in the petition, the prayer for modification in the condition No. a) is waived and the condition Nos. b) and e) are modified as under-b) That the accused applicant shall inform the learned Special Judge, Assam in writing supported by an affidavit and documents as and when he leaves the State of Assam and detail particulars of the places which he may visit with addresses for correspondence; e) That the accused applicant shall deposit back his Passport, VISA etc., if any, after return from his trip to outside the State of Assam on expiry of the specified period in the order of permission given by the learned Special Judge, Assam. This order shall form part of the order, dated 23.06.2022, passed in Bail Appln. No. 3384/2021 With the above direction, the interlocutory application stands disposed of.

JUDGE Comparing Assistant

Case details

Parties and counsel

Page No.# 1/4 GAHC010051802023 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Crl.)/184/2023 MD. SAIBAR RAHMAN S/O LATE ALAUDDIN AHMED, R/O HOUSE NO. 5, MEHERBAN PATH, GUWAHATI-38, P.S. HATIGAON DIST. KAMRUP (M), ASSAM. VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM, REPRESENTED BY THE PP, ASSAM Advocate for the Petitioner : MR Z KAMAR Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM Linked Case : Bail Appln./3384/2021 MD. SAIBAR RAHMAN S/O LATE ALAUDDIN AHMED R/O HOUSE NO. 5 MEHERBAN PATH GUWAHATI-38 P.S. HATIGAON DIST. KAMRUP (M) ASSAM Page No.# 2/4 VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM REP. BY THE PP ASSAM ------------ Advocate for : MR Z KAMAR Advocate for : PP ASSAM appearing for THE STATE OF ASSAM BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJIT BORTHAKUR

Source: High Court of Gauhati, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.