VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Gauhati High Court 2024 › High Court of Gauhati

Letharston Shira v. The General Manager and 2 Ors

Disposed Of
Court
High Court of Gauhati
Decided
25 February 2024
Bench
Parthivjyoti Saikiaauthor
Case no.
I.A.(Civil) 860/2023

Judgment

ORDER

26.02.2024 Heard Mr. H. Das, learned counsel appearing for the applicant. Also heard Mr. T. R. Gogoi, learned counsel for the respondents. This is an application filed under Section 5 of the Limitation Act praying for condonation of delay of 346 days in filing LA appeal against the judgment and order dated 21.12.2019. The delay has been explained in paragraphs 4 & 5. Mr. Gogoi, learned counsel submits that the delay has not been specifically explained. I have considered the submissions made by the learned counsel for the parties. This Court is of the opinion that the delay has been properly explained. Therefore, the delay stands condoned. The connected LA appeal shall be registered and list for admission hearing. IA stands disposed of.

JUDGE Comparing Assistant

Case details

Parties and counsel

PageoNo.#o1/2 GAHC010052182023 ooooooo ooooooooooooooo ooooooooooooooooTHEoGAUHATIoHIGHoCOURTo (HIGHoCOURToOFoASSAM,oNAGALAND,oMIZORAMoANDoARUNACHALoPRADESH)o CaseoNo.o:oI.A.(Civil)/860/2023 oooooooooooooooInoLAoApp.oNo.o2748/2023o LETHARSTONoSHIRAo SECRETARYoNIYAPALIoGIRJAoGHAR,o RESIDENToOFoVILLAGEoBANDARSHIoPARToIII,oPOoBANDARSHI,oPSo DUDHNOI,oDISToGOALPARA,oASSAM VERSUSo THEoGENERALoMANAGERoANDo2oORS.o NORTHoEASToFRONTIERoRAILWAYo,oMALIGAONo.oGUWAHATIo11,oASSAM 2:DEPUTYoCHIEFoENGINEERo(CONSTRUCTION) oNORTHEASToFRONTIERoRAILWAY oMALIGAON oGUWAHATIo11oASSAM 3:THEoSTATEoOFoASSAM oREPRESENTEDoBYoTHEoDEPUTYoCOMMISSIONERoCUMoCOLLECTOR oGOALPARA oASSAMo78310o AdvocateoforotheoPetitionerooooo:oMRoHoDASo AdvocateoforotheoRespondento:oGA,oASSAMoo oooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo Page No.# 2/2 BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHIVJYOTI SAIKIA

Source: High Court of Gauhati, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.