- Court
- High Court of Gauhati
- Decided
- 3 June 2024
- Bench
- Arun Dev Choudhury
- Case no.
- AB 664/2024
Judgment
ORDER
04.06.2024
Heard Mr. S. Nawaz, learned counsel for the petitioners. Also heard Mr. M. P. Goswami, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. By this application under Section 438 of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, the petitioners, namely, (1) Shajahan Ali @ Sahajahan Ali, (2) Moriom Khatun, (3) Tahmina Khatun @ Takmina Khatun, and (4) Raju Ahmed @ Nur Uddin Ahmed have approached this Court seeking the benefit of pre-arrest bail, apprehending their arrest, in connection with Abhayapuri Police Station Case No. 71/2024 registered under Sections 120B/304-B of IPC. This Court vide order dated 13.03.2024 has granted interim protection to the petitioners while calling for case diary. The case diary is received. Perused the same. From the material available on record, it is seen that the petitioners have fully cooperated with the investigation and their statements were also recorded. The material so far collected by the investigating officer, suggest that the accused No. 1, the husband of the deceased is the prime accused. The material so far collected against the present petitioners namely, (1) Shajahan Ali @ Sahajahan Page No.# 3/3 Ali, (2) Moriom Khatun, (3) Tahmina Khatun @ Takmina Khatun, and (4) Raju Ahmed @ Nur Uddin Ahmed, and the stage of investigation, in the considered opinion of this Court, donot warrant custodial interrogation of the petitioners in this case inasmuch as the petitioners had co-operated with the investigating authority and there is no allegation that they had tried to hamper and tamper with the investigation. Therefore, in the totality of the matter, the interim protection granted under order dated 13.03.2024 is made absolute with the same terms and condition. Accordingly, this bail application stands disposed of. Return back the case dairy. JUDGE Comparing Assistant
Case details
Parties and counsel
PageoNo.#o1/3 GAHC010053012024 ooooooo ooooooooooooooo ooooooooooooooooTHEoGAUHATIoHIGHoCOURTo (HIGHoCOURToOFoASSAM,oNAGALAND,oMIZORAMoANDoARUNACHALoPRADESH)o CaseoNo.o:oAB/664/2024o SHAJAHANoALIo@oSAHAJAHANoALIoANDoORSo S/OoLATEoSUKURoALI,o RESIDENToOFoVILLAGEoPARERCHARoPT.oIII,oPSoABHAYAPUR,oDISTo BONGAIGAON,oASSAM 2:oMORIOMoKHATUN oW/OoSHAJAHANoALIo@oSAHAJAHANoALI o RESIDENToOFoVILLAGEoPARERCHARoPT.oIII oPSoABHAYAPUR oDISToBONGAIGAON oASSAM 3:oTAHMINAoKHATUNo@oTAKMINAoKHATUN oW/OoTOTAMIYAoTHIKEDAR o RESIDENToOFoVILLAGEoPARERCHARoPT.oIII oPSoABHAYAPUR oDISToBONGAIGAON oASSAM 4:oRAJUoAHMEDo@oNURoUDDINoAHMED oS/OoSHAJAHANoALIo@oSAHAJAHANoALI o RESIDENToOFoVILLAGEoPARERCHARoPT.oIII oPSoABHAYAPUR oDISToBONGAIGAON oASSAo VERSUSo THEoSTATEoOFoASSAMo REPoBYoTHEoPPoASSAM Page No.# 2/3 Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. MUSTAFA HUSSAIN Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN DEV CHOUDHURY
Source: High Court of Gauhati, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.