VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Gauhati High Court 2024 › High Court of Gauhati

Md. Mojibur Rahman v. The State of Assam and Anr

Disposed Of
Court
High Court of Gauhati
Decided
30 May 2024
Bench
Arun Dev Choudhuryauthor
Case no.
Bail Appln. 758/2024

Judgment

O R D E R

31.05.2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the learned Additional Public Page No.# 2/3 Prosecutor, Assam. Also heard Ms. B Choudhury, learned counsel for the informant. This is an application filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. praying for granting regular bail to the petitioner, Md. Mojibur Rahman, who was arrested on 30.11.2023 and presently facing trial in connection with Special (POCSO) case No. 24/2024 under Section 376 (i) of IPC read with Section 4 of the POCSO Act. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor, Assam as well as learned counsel for the informant have seriously opposed in granting the bail to the petitioner. Scanned copy of the case record as called for has been received along with case diary of the connected case. Perused the same. This court has also perused the statement of the victim recorded under Section 161 Cr.P.C. and 164 Cr.P.C. It is seen from the record that the victim was allegedly about 17 years of age at the time of the commission of the offence. The petitioner was aged about 18 years 1 month at the time of commission of the offence. The statement of the victim girl suggest that the victim and the accused had love affair and they eloped and went Jagiroad and stayed at the residence of one relative of the petitioner and they had physical relation on that date i.e. on 26.11.2023. It is also stated that on 28.11.2023, the family members of the petitioner had taken them to the police station and her statement also suggest that she went with the petitioner out of her love. The petitioner was arrested on 30.11.2023 and he is in custody since then. The trial is at very initial stage and likely to take time to complete. Considering the matter in entirety including the material so collected by the I/O, the age of the petitioner, this court is of the opinion that the petitioner has been able to make out a case for grant of bail during the trial. Accordingly, the present application is allowed. It is directed that the applicant be released on bail on his furnishing a bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand Only) with one solvent surety of the like amount to the satisfaction of the learned Special Judge (POCSO), Hojai with the Page No.# 3/3 following conditions.

(1) The petitioner shall not hamper with the investigation, or tamper with the evidence of the case,

(2) The petitioner shall not repeat similar offence in future;

(3) The petitioner shall not, directly or indirectly, make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade them from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer,

(4) The petitioner shall appear before the I/O on each and every date as and when called for. Bail application stands disposed of.

JUDGE Comparing Assistant

Case details

Parties and counsel

Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010053552024 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Bail Appln./758/2024 MD. MOJIBUR RAHMAN S/O MD. ABDUL MANNAN @ HANNAN ALI R/O VILL- BALIMUKH KARATIPAM, P.S. MAYONG, DIST. MORIGAON, ASSAM VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ANR. REP. BY THE PP, ASSAM 2:MUSSTT. SULEMA KHATUN W/O AIZUL HAQUE R/O VILL- JAMUHANDAL P.S. HOJAI DIST. HOJAI ASSA Advocate for the Petitioner : MR J C BORAH Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE ARUN DEV CHOUDHURY

Source: High Court of Gauhati, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.