VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Gauhati High Court 2024 › High Court of Gauhati

Mohibul Sikdar v. The State of Assam

Disposed Of
Court
High Court of Gauhati
Decided
7 April 2024
Bench
S. Justice Malasri Nandiauthor
Case no.
Bail Appln. 774/2024

Judgment

ORDER

08.04.2024

Heard Mr. R. S. Mishra, learned counsel appearing for the accused petitioner as well as Mr. D. P. Goswami, learned Addl. P.P., Assam appearing for the State respondent. By this petition under Section 439 Cr.P.C., the accused-petitioner, namely, Mohibul Sikdar, has prayed for grant of bail in connection with Goalpara P.S. Page No.# 2/3 Case No.21/2024 under Sections 120(B)/420/384/34 IPC, R/W Section 12 of the Assam Money Lenders Act (amended), 1968. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner is detained in judicial custody for last 35 days since his arrest i.e. on 04.03.2024. It is further submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the name of the peititoner is not mentioned in the FIR. However, the person whose name is mentioned in the FIR has already been released on bail. Considering the length of detention, bail prayer may be considered. Mr. D. P. Goswami, learned Additional Public Prosecutor has submitted that though there is material against the petitioner. However, considering the length of detention, bail may be considered. In view of the submission of learned counsel for both the parties and considering the length of detention, this Court is of the view that further custodial interrogation of the accused-petitioner is not necessary in the interest of investigation of the case. Accordingly, the petitioner, named above, shall be released on bail, on furnishing bail bond of Rs.30,000/- with one suitable surety of the like amount, to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Goalpara. The direction for bail is further subject to the conditions that the petitioner:

(a) shall not leave the territorial jurisdiction of learned CJM, Goalpara, Assam without prior written permission from him/her;

(b) shall not hamper with the investigation, or tamper with the evidence of the case;

(c) shall not, directly or indirectly, make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer. Page No.# 3/3 In terms of the above, this bail application stands disposed of.

JUDGE Comparing Assistant

Case details

Parties and counsel

Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010053792024 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Bail Appln./774/2024 MOHIBUL SIKDAR S/O LATE DOLILUDDIN SIKDAR VILL- AZAD NAGAR, P.S. GOALPARA DIST. GOALPARA, ASSAM VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM REP. BY THE PP, GOVT. OF ASSAM Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. A M KHAN Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM BEFORE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE MALASRI NANDI

Source: High Court of Gauhati, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.