VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Gauhati High Court 2023 › High Court of Gauhati

Mizanur @ Mijanur Rahman and 5 Ors v. The State of Assam

Disposed Of
Court
High Court of Gauhati
Decided
27 June 2023
Bench
Manash Ranjan Pathakauthor
Case no.
AB 956/2023

Judgment

ORDER 27-06-2023 Heard Mr. S. Munir, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. B.Sarma, learned Additional Public Prosecutor, Assam for the State. By this application under Section 438 CrPC, the petitioners, namely, 1) Mizanur @ Mijanur Rahman, 2) Saibul Islam @ Saiful Islam, 3) Kholil @ Khalilur Rahman, 4) Rabiul Hoque @ Rabiul Hussain 5) Rafikul Islam and 6) Sofikul Islam @ Safilkul Page No.# 3/5 Islam apprehending their arrest are seeking pre-arrest bail in Boko P.S. Case No. 262/2022 registered under Sections 147/148/149/325/326/307/ 447/302 IPC corresponding to G. R. No. 305(K)/2022. As per the FIR of the case lodged by the complainant on 09.06.2022, a land dispute between the side of the complainant and that of the accused person, petitioners herein was going on since last few days and the accused persons used to encroached upon the landed property of the complainant by using force, threat and violence even threatening to kill them. Complainant stated that on the strength of an injunction order vide Misc. (J) 115/2022 in T.S. 138/2022 and obtaining orders from the Amingaon Civil Court as well as in one petition No. 143 dated 27.05.2022 under Section 107 CrPC, his father and family members were cultivating the said land. On 09.06.2023 around 06:30 am when his father and uncle went to the jute field for cultivation to work then, the complainant and his family members were attacked with knife, dao, stick (lathi), rods in which his father Ali Akbar was severely injured at the spot on being beaten by the accused persons on his head and various parts of his body. Inspite of calling of 108 Ambulance and immediately taking him to Sontoli Primary Heath Centre, but as the condition of his father became critical he was referred to Gauhati Medical College and Hospital for better treatment and that his mother Rahima Khatun, brother Rabbul Ali, uncle Noor Muhammad @ Kalu, Norjamal Hoque, Nurul Hoque, aunt Banesa Khatun and Parbina Khatun are in critical condition undergoing treatment at GMCH. The same was registered as Boko P.S. Case No. 262/2022 under Sections 147/148/149/325/326/307/447/302 IPC corresponding to G. R. No. 305(K)/2022. Contention of the petitioners is that the investigating authorities have submitted a part charge-sheet No. 279/2022 dated 30.08.2022 received by the Court of Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Boko and that altogether 27 numbers of accused persons were named in the FIR, out of which only 8 accused persons were arrested and those arrested charge-sheeted persons are on bail and that the petitioners are working as cultivators/labourers in the said disputed land and are no way connected with the case. Record reveals that there was a group clash took place on the date of incident between Page No.# 4/5 the side of the complainant and the side of the accused persons initiated from a land dispute, in which altogether three persons, two from the petitioners side and one from the side of the complainant succumbed to the injuries sustained during such fight. Police authorities have already submitted the charge-sheet and further investigation is still going on. Considering the above, the Court is of the view that custodial interrogation of the petitioners are not warranted to investigate said Boko P.S. Case No. 262/2022. As such, this pre-arrest bail application of the petitioners is accepted. Accordingly, it is provided that in the event of arrest of the petitioners namely, 1) Mizanur @ Mijanur Rahman, 2) Saibul Islam @ Saiful Islam, 3) Kholil @ Khalilur Rahman, 4) Rabiul Hoque @ Rabiul Hussain 5) Rafikul Islam and 6) Sofikul Islam @ Safilkul Islam, they be released on bail in said Boko P.S. Case No. 262/2022, on furnishing a bail bond of Rs.50,000/- each, with 2 (two) local sureties each of the like amount, to the satisfaction of the arresting authority on conditions that the petitioners shall – (i) appear before the concerned Magistrate in said G.R. Case No.305(K)/2022 arising out of Boko P.S. Case No. 262/2022 on or before 07.07.2023 and thereafter, as and when they are required and/or on the dates so fixed in said G.R. Case No. 305(K)/2022 and further before the Investigating Officer of the case for necessary investigation of the case; (ii) not leave the territorial jurisdiction of the Boko Police Station, without obtaining prior written permission from the concerned Investigating Officer of the case; (iii) not hamper with the investigation, or tamper with the evidence of the case and (iv) they shall not, directly or indirectly, make any inducement, threat or promise to the complainant or his family members and/or to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade them from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer, failing which, the bail granted to them in the aforesaid Boko P.S. Case No. 262/2022 shall stand automatically vacated. Further, the petitioners shall not indulge in similar offence or any criminal offences in future, failing which, the bail granted to them in said Boko P.S. Case No. 262/2022 shall stand automatically vacated. Any violation of the aforesaid terms and conditions by the petitioners, named above, the Page No.# 5/5 bail granted to them in the aforementioned Boko P.S. Case No. 262/2022 shall stand automatically vacated. With the above observation and directions, this pre-arrest bail application accordingly stands allowed to the extent above.

JUDGE Comparing Assistant

Case details

Parties and counsel

PageoNo.#o1/5 GAHC010054412023 ooooooo ooooooooooooooo ooooooooooooooooTHEoGAUHATIoHIGHoCOURTo (HIGHoCOURToOFoASSAM,oNAGALAND,oMIZORAMoANDoARUNACHALoPRADESH)o CaseoNo.o:oAB/956/2023o MIZANURo@oMIJANURoRAHMANoANDo5oORSo S/OoFATIKoALIo R/OoVILL-oKISMAToKATHMIo P.O.oDEKASANGo P.S.oBOKOo DIST.oKAMRUPo(R),oASSAM 2:oSAIBULoISLAMo@oSAIFULoISLAM oS/OoMD.oHELAJUDDINo R/OoVILL-oKISMAToKATHMIo P.O.oDEKASANGo P.S.oBOKOo DIST.oKAMRUPo(R) oASSAM 3:oKHOLILo@oKHALILURoRAHMAN oS/OoFATIKoALIo R/OoVILL-oKISMAToKATHMIo P.O.oDEKASANGo P.S.oBOKOo DIST.oKAMRUPo(R) oASSAM 4:oRABIULoHOQUEo@oRABIULoHUSSAIN oS/OoKURBANoALIo R/OoVILL-oKISMAToKATHMIo P.O.oDEKASANGo P.S.oBOKOo DIST.oKAMRUPo(R) oASSAM 5:oRAFIKULoISLAM oS/OMD.oHELAJUDDINo R/OoVILL-oKISMAToKATHMIo Page No.# 2/5 P.O. DEKASANG P.S. BOKO DIST. KAMRUP (R) ASSAM 6: SOFIKUL ISLAM @ SAFIKUL ISLAM S/O KURBAN ALI R/O VILL- KISMAT KATHMI P.O. DEKASANG P.S. BOKO DIST. KAMRUP (R) ASSA VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM REP. BY THE PP, ASSAM Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. S MUNIR Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM BEFORE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANASH RANJAN PATHAK

Source: High Court of Gauhati, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.