- Court
- High Court of Gauhati
- Decided
- 27 March 2024
- Bench
- S. Justice Malasri Nandi
- Case no.
- Bail Appln. 783/2024
Judgment
ORDER Date : 28.03.2024
Heard Mr. N.J. Dutta, learned counsel for the petitioners. Also heard Mr. B.B. Gogoi, learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the State. This is an application filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C., seeking bail by the petitioners, namely, (i) Saban Ali (ii) Nasir Uddin @ Nasir Ali (iii) Kabir Ali (iv) Nazrul Islam @ Nurul Islam @ Najrul Islam (v) Arif Uddin, in connection with Basistha P.S. Case No. 137/2024, registered under Section 120B/379 IPC r/w Section 11/(1)(d) of Prevention of Cruelty to Animal Act, 1960 and r/w Section 13(1)/16 of Assam Cattle Preservation Act. The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that as per FIR, the allegation against the present petitioners is that they escorted a vehicle from which some cattle were recovered which was suspected to be stolen cattle. It is further submitted that the petitioners had been carrying the said cattle which Page No.# 3/4 were purchased from Banglagarh cattle market by another person. Nothing has been recovered from the possession of the present petitioners. The petitioners have been languishing in jail hazot since 04.03.2024. Considering the period of detention as well as the background of the case, the petitioners may be enlarged on bail. On the other hand, Mr. Gogoi, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State has vehemently opposed in granting bail to the petitioners. He further submits that case diary has been received from which it appears that the petitioners are the master mind for trafficking such cattle from one State to another State. Therefore, he has prayed that at this stage, bail may not be considered to the petitioners. I have considered the submissions made by the learned counsel for the parties. I have also perused the case diary. It appears that no any cattle was recovered from the possession of the present petitioners. They were not travelling in the said vehicle from which the cattle were recovered. The petitioners were in another vehicle bearing Regd. No. AS-01-DQ-7877. Considering the background of the case as well as the length of detention of the petitioners, this Court is of the view that further custodial interrogation of the accused-petitioners is not necessary for the purpose of investigation of the case. Accordingly, the accused-petitioners, named above, shall be released on bail in connection with Basistha P.S. Case No. 137/2024, registered under Section 120B/379 IPC r/w Section 11/(1)(d) of Prevention of Cruelty to Animal Act, 1960 and r/w Section 13(1)/16 of Assam Cattle Preservation Act, on furnishing bail bond of Rs.20,000/- each with a Page No.# 4/4 suitable surety each of the like amount to the satisfaction of learned CJM, Kamrup(M), Guwahati, Assam. The direction for bail is further subject to the conditions that the accused-petitioners:
(a) shall not leave the territorial jurisdiction of learned CJM, Kamrup(M), Guwahati, Assam, without prior written permission from him/her;
(b) shall not, directly or indirectly, make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade them from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer. In terms of the above, this bail application stands disposed of. Send back the case diary.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant
Case details
Parties and counsel
PageoNo.#o1/4 GAHC010055032024 ooooooo ooooooooooooooo ooooooooooooooooTHEoGAUHATIoHIGHoCOURTo (HIGHoCOURToOFoASSAM,oNAGALAND,oMIZORAMoANDoARUNACHALoPRADESH)o CaseoNo.o:oBailoAppln./783/2024o SABANoALIoANDo4oORS.o S/OoHUSSAINoALIo R/OoVILL-oBAGHBORo P.O.oANDoP.S.oBAGHBORo DIST.oBARPETA,oASSAM 2:oNASIRoUDDINo@oNASIRoALI oS/OoNABARUDDINoA@oNABURoUDDINo R/OoVILL-oBAGHBORo P.O.oANDoP.S.oBAGHBOR o DIST.oBARPETA oASSAM 3:oKABIRoALI oS/OoKACHEoALIo@oKASHEMoALIo R/OoVILL-oBAGHBORo P.O.oANDoP.S.oBAGHBOR o DIST.oBARPETA oASSAM 4:oNAZRULoISLAMo@oNURULoISLAMo@oNAJRULoISLAM oS/OoAMARoALIo@oOMARoALIo R/OoVILL-oBAGHBORo P.O.oANDoP.S.oBAGHBOR o DIST.oBARPETA oASSAM 5:oARIFoUDDIN oS/OoSUDDUoPARAMANIKo@oSHADUoPARAMANIKo R/OoVILL-oBAGHBORo P.O.oANDoP.S.oBAGHBOR Page No.# 2/4 DIST. BARPETA ASSA VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM REP BY THE PP, ASSAM Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. N J DUTTA Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM BEFORE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE MALASRI NANDI
Source: High Court of Gauhati, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.