Amaz Husen Barbhuiya v. The State of Assam

PageoNo.#o1/2 GAHC010055122024 ooooooo ooooooooooooooo ooooooooooooooooTHEoGAUHATIoHIGHoCOURTo (HIGHoCOURToOFoASSAM,oNAGALAND,oMIZORAMoANDoARUNACHALoPRADESH)o CaseoNo.o:oAB/691/2024o AMAZoHUSENoBARBHUIYAo SONoOFoMOTIURoRAHMANoBARBHUIYAo R/OoDURGAPURo P.O.oDURGAPUR,o DIST.oCACHAR,oASSAMo PIN-788110,oASSAM VERSUSo THEoSTATEoOFoASSAMo REPoBYoTHEoPP,oASSAM AdvocateoforotheoPetitionerooooo:oMRoDoJoHALOIo AdvocateoforotheoRespondento:oPP,oASSAMoo oooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo ::kBEFOREk::k HON'BLEkMR.kJUSTICEkPARTHIVJYOTIkSAIKIA kOkkkRkkkDkkkEkkkRk

09.04.2024 o Heard the learned counsel Mr. D.J. Haloi appearing for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. B. Sarma, the learned Addl. Public Prosecutor representing the State of Page No.# 2/2 Assam.

¶2This is an application under Section 438 of the CrPC in respect of Lala P.S. case No.10/2024 under Sections 120(B)/420/379 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶3Pursuant to an interim order granted in favour of the petitioner, he has appeared before the Investigating Officer and has co-operated with police investigation.

¶4For this reason, the petitioner Amaz Husen Barbhuiya does not deserve to be detained in custody. His pre-arrest bail application is allowed.

¶5The interim bail order granted in favour of the petitioner is made absolute. The application for bail is disposed of.

JUDGE Comparing Assistant