VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Gauhati High Court 2023 › High Court of Gauhati

Ayar Ali @ Ayeb Ali @ Ayub Ali v. The Union of India and 5 Ors

Disposed Of
Court
High Court of Gauhati
Decided
22 March 2023
Bench
Achintya Malla Bujor Barua, Robin Phukan
Case no.
WP(C) 1822/2019

Judgment

ORDER

22.03.2023 (AM Bujor Barua, J)

Heard Mr. AR Sikdar, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Ms. L Devi, learned CGC for the respondents in the Union of India as well as for the authorities under the NRC, Mr. AI Ali, learned counsel for the authorities under the Election Commission of India, Mr. G Sharma, learned Special Standing Counsel, Foreigners Tribunal for the Home Department, Government of Assam, as well as the Superintendent of Police (B) Barpeta, and Ms. K Phukan, learned Government Advocate for the Deputy Commissioner, Barpeta.

¶2The petitioner, Ayar Ali @ Ayeb Ali @ Ayub Ali, was referred to the Foreigners Tribunal No.5th, Barpeta for rendering an opinion as to whether he is a person who had entered the State of Assam on or after 25.03.1971 resulting in the registration of F.T. Case No.278/17 wherein an opinion dated 31.12.2018 was rendered declaring the petitioner to be a person who had entered the State Page No.# 3/4 of Assam from the specified territory on or after 25.03.1971.

¶3Being aggrieved this writ petition is instituted.

¶4The petitioner claims before the Court that he is the son of Ohed Ali@ Ahed Ali of village Tapajuli Pathar Mouza Jania in the Barpeta district. The petitioner states that his father Ohed Ali@ Ahed Ali died some time in the year 1962, when the petitioner was about 5/6 years old. The petitioner refers to a certified copy of the Jamabandi of the year 1958-1965 of new Kheraj Mayadi Patta No.21 of village Tapajuli Pathar under Jania Mouza which contains the name of pattadars, their fathers' name and addresses. The pattadar No.1 is shown as Ohed Ali and the pattadar No.3 is shown as Ayeb Ali. The petitioner claims that he himself is Ayeb Ali.

¶5In view of such material being produced by the petitioner, the matter stands remanded back to the Tribunal for an examination of the Jamabandi produced by the petitioner of the year 1958-1965 of new Kheraj Mayadi Patta No.21 of village Tapajuli Pathar under Jania Mouza and arrive at a reasoned order as to whether the same material indicates that the petitioner is a citizen of India.

¶6Accordingly, the petitioner shall appear before the Tribunal on 28.04.2023.

¶7The respondent Superintendent of Police (B) Barpeta may make its own verification, if so advised, as to whether Ayeb Ali whose name appears in the Page No.# 4/4 Jamabandi of the year 1958-1965 of new Kheraj Mayadi Patta No.21 of village Tapajuli Pathar under Jania Mouza and the Ayeb Ali being the present proceedee are one and the same person.

¶8Upon the matter being remanded back, the Tribunal after examining the evidences and materials shall pass a reasoned order. In the event, the reasoned order is in favour of the petitioner, the same shall prevail over the order dated

31.12.2018 of the Foreigners Tribunal No.5th, Barpeta in F.T. Case No.278/17 and if it is against the petitioner, consequential action under the law shall follow.

¶9Till the reasoned order is passed, no coercive action be taken against the petitioner.

¶10Writ petition stands disposed of in the above terms.

JUDGE JUDGE Comparing Assistant

Case details

Parties and counsel

PageoNo.#o1/4 GAHC010056962019 ooooooo ooooooooooooooo ooooooooooooooooTHEoGAUHATIoHIGHoCOURTo (HIGHoCOURToOFoASSAM,oNAGALAND,oMIZORAMoANDoARUNACHALoPRADESH)o CaseoNo.o:oWP(C)/1822/2019o AYARoALIo@oAYEBoALIo@oAYUBoALIo S/O-oLToOHEDoALIo@oAHEDoALI,oR/O-oVILL-oTAPAJULIoPATHAR,oP.O.o BALIKURI,oP.S.oKALGACHIA,oDIST-oBARPETA,oASSAM,oPIN-o781319 VERSUSo THEoUNIONoOFoINDIAoANDo5oORS.o REP.oBYoTHEoSECY.oTOoTHEoGOVT.oOFoINDIA,oMINISTRYoOFoHOMEo AFFAIRS,oSHASTRIoBHAWAN,oTILOKoMARG,oNEWoDELHI-1 2:THEoSTATEoOFoASSAM oREP.oBYoTHEoCOMM.oANDoSECY.oTOoTHEoGOVT.oOFoASSAM oHOMEoDEPTT. oDISPUR oGHY-6 3:THEoDY.oCOMMISSIONER oBARPETA oP.O.oBARPETA oDIST-oBARPETA oASSAM oPIN-o781301 4:THEoSUPERINTENDENToOFoPOLICEo(B) oBARPETA oP.O.oBARPETA oDIST-oBARPETA oASSAM oPIN-o781301 5:THEoELECTIONoCOMMISSIONERoOFoINDIA oNEWoDELHI-1 Page No.# 2/4 6:THE ASSAM STATE CO-ORDINATOR OF NRC BHANGAGARH GHY- Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. A R SIKDAR Advocate for the Respondent : ASSTT.S.G.I. (R1) BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ACHINTYA MALLA BUJOR BARUA HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ROBIN PHUKAN

Source: High Court of Gauhati, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.