VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Gauhati High Court 2024 › High Court of Gauhati

Smti. Kajal Devi and 2 Ors v. The State of Assam

Disposed Of
Court
High Court of Gauhati
Decided
23 April 2024
Bench
S. Justice Malasri Nandiauthor
Case no.
Bail Appln. 851/2024

Judgment

PageoNo.#o1/3 GAHC010059682024 ooooooo ooooooooooooooo ooooooooooooooooTHEoGAUHATIoHIGHoCOURTo (HIGHoCOURToOFoASSAM,oNAGALAND,oMIZORAMoANDoARUNACHALoPRADESH)o CaseoNo.o:oBailoAppln./851/2024o SMTI.oKAJALoDEVIoANDo2oORS.o W/OoMANOJoMANDALo VILL-oSIMRAHAo P.S.oTIKAoPATTYo DIST.oPURNIAoBIHAR 2:oSMTIoKUSUMoDEVI oW/OoBIJAYoMANDALo VILL-oSIMRAHAo P.S.oTIKAoPATTYo DIST.oPURNIA oBIHAR 3:oPUNAMoDEVI oW/OoPRAMODoMANDALo VILL-oSIMRAHAo P.S.oTIKA-PATTYo DIST.oPURNIA oBIHARo VERSUSo THEoSTATEoOFoASSAMo REP.oBYoTHEoPP,oASSAM AdvocateoforotheoPetitionerooooo:oMR.oMoIoHUSSAINo AdvocateoforotheoRespondento:oPP,oASSAMoo ooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo BEFORE HONOURABLEoMRS.oJUSTICEoMALASRIoNANDI ORDERo Page No.# 2/3

24.04.2024

Heard Mr. M. I. Hussain, learned counsel appearing for the accused petitioners as well as Mr. R. J. Baruah, learned Addl. P.P., Assam appearing for the State respondent. By this petition under Section 439 Cr.P.C., the accused-petitioners, namely, (i) Smti Kajal Devi (ii) Smti Kusum Devi and (iii) Punam Devi, have prayed for grant of bail in connection with Bongaigaon GRPS Case No.19/2024 under Sections 20(b)(ii)B/29 of the NDPS Act. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioners that the petitioners have been detained in judicial custody for last 60 days since their arrest i.e. on

24.02.2024. Learned counsel for the petitioner further has submitted that as they have completed the statutory period of detention and charge-sheet has also not yet been submitted, so the petitioners are entitled for default bail. Mr. R. J. Baruah, learned Additional Public Prosecutor has submitted that bail may be granted to the petitioners as charge-sheet has not yet been submitted in the case and they have completed the statutory period of detention. In view of the submission of learned counsel for both the parties and considering the length of detention, this Court is of the view that further custodial interrogation of the accused-petitioners is not necessary in the interest of investigation of the case. Accordingly, the petitioners, named above, shall be released on bail, on furnishing bail bond of Rs.50,000/- each with two suitable sureties each of the like amount out of which one should be Government employee of the State of Assam, to the satisfaction of learned Special Judge, Bongaigaon, Assam. The direction for bail is further subject to the conditions that the petitioner: Page No.# 3/3

(a) shall not leave the territorial jurisdiction of learned Special Judge, Bongaigaon, Assam without prior written permission from him/her;

(b) shall not hamper with the investigation, or tamper with the evidence of the case;

(c) shall not, directly or indirectly, make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer. In terms of the above, this bail application stands disposed of.

JUDGE Comparing Assistant

Source: High Court of Gauhati, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.