- Court
- High Court of Gauhati
- Decided
- 4 April 2023
- Bench
- Susmita Phukan Khaund
- Case no.
- AB 1030/2023
Judgment
PageoNo.#o1/4 GAHC010060062023 ooooooo ooooooooooooooo ooooooooooooooooTHEoGAUHATIoHIGHoCOURTo (HIGHoCOURToOFoASSAM,oNAGALAND,oMIZORAMoANDoARUNACHALoPRADESH)o CaseoNo.o:oAB/1030/2023o DILDARoHUSSAINoANDo8oORSo S/OoDULALoUDDINo R/OoVILL-oSHILLONGONIo P.S.oNAGAONoSADARo DIST.oNAGAON,oASSAM 2:oGULZARoHUSSAIN oS/OoDULALoUDDINo R/OoVILL-oSHILLONGONIo P.S.oNAGAONoSADARo DIST.oNAGAON oASSAMo PH.oNO.o7002282767 3:oANUARoHUSSAIN oS/OoDULALoUDDINo R/OoVILL-oSHILLONGONIo P.S.oNAGAONoSADARo DIST.oNAGAON oASSAMo PH.oNO.o7002282767 4:oDULALoUDDIN oS/OoLT.oABDULoSOBHANo R/OoVILL-oSHILLONGONIo P.S.oNAGAONoSADARo DIST.oNAGAON oASSAMo PH.oNO.o7002282767 5:oSAYDULoRAHMAN oS/OoLT.oABDULoSOBHANo R/OoVILL-oSHILLONGONIo P.S.oNAGAONoSADARo Page No.# 2/4 DIST. NAGAON ASSAM PH. NO. 7002282767 6: SWABAJE ALI S/O LT. SULEMAN MUNSI R/O VILL-PUB NARAMARI
P.S. NAGAON SADAR DIST. NAGAON ASSAM PH. NO. 7002282767 7: CHAFIKUL ISLAM S/O SBABAJE ALI R/O VILL-PUB NARAMARI
P.S. NAGAON SADAR DIST. NAGAON ASSAM PH. NO. 7002282767 8: MOFIDUL ISLAM S/O SBABAJE ALI R/O VILL-PUB NARAMARI
P.S. NAGAON SADAR DIST. NAGAON ASSAM PH. NO. 7002282767 9: RAFIKUL ISLAM S/O SBABAJE ALI R/O VILL-PUB NARAMARI
P.S. NAGAON SADAR DIST. NAGAON ASSAM PH. NO. 700228276 VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM REP. BY THE PP, ASSAM Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. Y SIKDAR Page No.# 3/4 Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM
B E F O R E HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SUSMITA PHUKAN KHAUND
04.04.2023
¶1Heard Mr. Y. Sikdar, learned counsel appearing for the petitioners as well as Mr. R. R. Kaushik, learned Addl. P.P. appearing for the State respondent.
¶2The petitioners, namely, Dildar Hussain, Gulzar Hussain, Anuar Hussain, Saydul Rahman, Swabaje Ali, Chafikul Islam, Mofidul Islam, Rafikul Islam have filed this application under Section 438 Cr.P.C with prayer for pre-arrest bail as they are apprehending arrest in connection with Nagaon P.S. Case No. 69/2023, under Sections 147/148/149/325/326/307 IPC,
¶3I have given my anxious consideration to the submissions at the Bar and I have perused the case diary.
¶4The allegation against the petitioners is that on 23.01.2023 at about 12.00 noon, the accused named in the FIR assaulted Rashida Khatun, Anarul Hoque, Jiwaur Rahman, Taibur Rahman, Jalaluddin, Samsul Hoque, and three others and hit them on their head, arms and on different parts of their body with sharp weapons and they sustained grievous injuries. Presently, three persons are in the hospital undergoing treatment.
¶5The learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that no specific act has been attributed to the petitioners. One person has sustained grievous injuries.
¶6Learned Addl. P.P. has submitted that Taibur Rahman has sustained grievous injuries Page No.# 4/4 caused by sharp weapon and other injured persons have sustained simple injuries. The statement of the witnesses under Section 161 Cr.P.C. incriminates the petitioner no. 2, Gulzar Hussain, petitioner no. 6, Swabaje Ali, petitioner no. 7, Chafikul Islam, petitioner no. 8, Mofidul Islam and the petitioner no. 9, Rafikul Islam. The bail prayers of the aforementioned persons are rejected at this stage of investigation. However, in the event of their arrest, the petitioners no. 1, Dildar Hussain, petitioner no. 3, Anuar Hussain, petitioner no. 5, Saydul Rahman, shall be enlarged on bail of Rs. 30,000/- each with a suitable surety each of like amount to the satisfaction of the arresting authority, under the conditions that,
(i) the petitioners will not hamper or tamper with the evidence;
(ii) the petitioners will refrain from such activities with which they are alleged; and
(iii) the petitioners will co-operate with the investigation and the petitioners will appear before the I/O within 10(ten) days.
(iv) the petitioners will not leave the jurisdiction court without permission till the completion of the investigation. Send back the case diary.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant
Source: High Court of Gauhati, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.