- Court
- High Court of Gauhati
- Decided
- 14 March 2024
- Bench
- Devashis Baruah
- Case no.
- I.A.(Civil) 812/2023
Judgment
ORDER Date : 15.03.2024
¶1This is an application filed under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963 for condonation of delay of 1317 days in filing the application for restoration of RSA No.148/2018 which was dismissed on withdrawal on 07.06.2019. Page No.# 5/6
¶2From a perusal of the materials on record, it reveals that on 07.06.2019, the RSA No.148/2018 which was at the hearing stage was withdrawn by the counsel representing the Appellants. It was under such circumstances, the said RSA No.148/2018 was dismissed on withdrawal.
¶3The reason assigned for filing this application on 17.03.2023 i.e. after a period of 1317 days is that the Applicant No.1 was at Bangalore with her daughter and the Applicant No.2 was also staying at Bangalore after filing of the second appeal during the period from 2019-2020 and he had little knowledge about the legal proceedings for which he did not enquire about the second appeal. It is the specific and categorical statement made in paragraph No.12 of the application that only after return of the Applicant No.1 from Bangalore in the month of January, 2023 they enquired about the second appeal in the month of February, 2023 from the website of the Gauhati High Court and came to know about the withdrawal of the second appeal.
¶4On the other hand, a perusal of the said application and more particularly at paragraph No.8, it shows that the Applicant No.2 had duly appeared before the executing Court on 08.02.2021 in connection with Title Execution Case No.15/2019 which was continued pursuant to the dismissal of the RSA No.148/2018. Therefore, when the Applicant No.2 had duly participated in the said Title Execution Case No.15/2019 and that too specifically on 08.02.2021, the Applicant No.2 duly had knowledge about the order passed by this Court on
07.06.2019 whereby the RSA No.148/2018 was dismissed on withdrawal. In that view of the matter, the grounds which have been made for seeking condonation of delay of 1317 days on the face of it appears to be incorrect and mischievous in order to mislead this Court for which this Court dismisses the instant application for condonation of delay. Page No.# 6/6
¶5Apart from that, this Court also finds it relevant to take note of that when the Regular Second Appeal was dismissed on withdrawal, the question of restoration of the said appeal is beyond comprehension and as such on merits also, the restoration of the appeal has no legs to stand. Consequently, the I.A. (Civil) No.812/2023 stands dismissed. This Court imposes a cost of Rs.10,000/- upon the Applicants to be deposited before this Court.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant
Case details
Parties and counsel
PageoNo.#o1/6 GAHC010060162023 ooooooo ooooooooooooooo ooooooooooooooooTHEoGAUHATIoHIGHoCOURTo (HIGHoCOURToOFoASSAM,oNAGALAND,oMIZORAMoANDoARUNACHALoPRADESH)o CaseoNo.o:oI.A.(Civil)/812/2023o SRIoSAKUNTOLAoKANUoANDoANRo W/OoLATEoKESHABoPRASADoKANU,oVILL.oHAILAKANDIoTOWN,oWARDoNO. 12,oP.O.oHAILAKANDI,oP.S.oHAILAKANDI,oDIST.oHAILAKANDI,oASSAM,oPINo 788152 2:oSRIoSHEKHARoPRASADoKANU oS/OoLATEoKESHABoPRASADoKANU oPRESENTLYoRESIDINGoAToVILL.oHAILAKANDI oP.S.oHAILAKANDI oDIST.oHAILAKANDI oPINo78815o VERSUSo SRIoRAJENDRAoPRASADoKANUoANDo14oORSo S/OoLATEoRAMUGRAoPRASADoKANU,oVILL.oHAILAKANDIoTOWN,oWARDo NO.o12,oP.O.oHAILAKANDI,oP.S.oHAILAKANDI,oDIST.oHAILAKANDI,oASSAM,o PINo788152 2:SRIoSANJAYoKUMARoKANU oS/OoSRIoSUMANTAoLALoKANU oR/OoVILL.oNEVIAoBAZAR oP.O.oOLIVIAoCHERRA oP.S.oRATABARI oDIST.oKARIMGANJ oPINo788737 3:SRIoNANDAoKISHORoKANU oS/OoSRIoSUMANTAoLALoKANU oR/OoVILL.oNEVIAoBAZAR oP.O.oOLIVIAoCHERRA oP.S.oRATABARI PageoNo.#o2/6 oDIST.oKARIMGANJ oPINo788737 4:SRIoSANJIBoKANU oS/OoSRIoSUMANTAoLALoKANU oR/OoVILL.oNEVIAoBAZAR oP.O.oOLIVIAoCHERRA oP.S.oRATABARI oDIST.oKARIMGANJ oPINo788737 5:SRIoDIDULoKANU oS/OoSRIoSUMANTAoLALoKANU oR/OoVILL.oNEVIAoBAZAR oP.O.oOLIVIAoCHERRA oP.S.oRATABARI oDIST.oKARIMGANJ oPINo788737 6:SRIoKAMALJIToKANU oS/OoSRIoSUMANTAoLALoKANU oR/OoVILL.oNEVIAoBAZAR oP.O.oOLIVIAoCHERRA oP.S.oRATABARI oDIST.oKARIMGANJ oPINo788737 7:SMTIoSUMITRAoKANU oW/OoSRIoRAJENDRAoPRASADo oVILL.oIRRIGATIONoDIVISIONoOFFICE oSRKARIoBAGAN oP.O.oHAFLONG oDIST.oNORTHoCACHARoHILL oPINo788819 oPRESENTLYoRESIDINGoAToHOUSEoNO.o3N oJURIPAR oPANJABARI o3RDoBYoLANE oWARDoNO.o53 oGUWAHATI-37 oASSAM. 8:SMTIoSARITAoGUPTA oW/OoSRIoRAVIoSHANKARoGUPTA PageoNo.#o3/6 oR/OoSWEEToPALACEoPARADISE oMAINoROAD oDANAPURoBAZAR oDANAPURoCANTT. oPATNA oBIHAR oPINo801503 9:SMTIoSHARMILAoGUPTA oW/OoLATEoBIJONoKUMARoGUPTA o26-04 o166oSTREETo oDIST.oSLUSHING oNEWoYORK oPINo11358oU.S.A. 10:SMTIoSHARMISTAoGUPTA oW/OoSRIoMONOJoKUMARoGUPTA oFLAToNO.o101 oSONAoSUSHILAoAPARTMENT o12oMIANoROAD oMATRIKERI oBANGLOREo54 11:SRIoSHEKHARoPRASADoKANOO oS/OoLATEoKASHABoPRASADoKANU oPRESENTLYoRESIDINGoAToHAILAKANDIoTOWN oWARDoNO.o12 oP.O.oHAILAKANDI oP.S.oANDoDIST.oHAILAKANDI o788152. 12:SRIoBIJAYoPRASADoKANU oS/OoBOYAJNATNoPRASADoKANU oR/OoHAILAKANDIoTOWN oWARDoNO.o12 oP.O.oHAILAKANDI oP.S.oHAILAKANDI oDIST.oHAILAKANDI oPINo788152 13:SRIoAJAYoPRASADoKANU oS/OoLAKSHIoRANIoKANUoANDoLATEoGANESHoPRASADoKANU oVILL.oHAILAKANDIoTOWN oWARDoNO.o12 oP.O.oHAILAKANDI Page No.# 4/6 P.S. HAILAKANDI DIST. HAILAKANDI ASSAM PIN 788152 14:SMTI BHAGABOTI SAHU W/O LATE PAROSH NATH SAHU C/O MAA DENTAL CLINIC R/O SHIBBARI ROAD HAILAKANDI TOWN WARD NO. 12 P.O. HAILAKANDI P.S. HAILAKANDI DIST. HAILAKANDI ASSAM PIN 788152 15:SRI SUBRATA KUMAR DEB S/O LATE SUNIL KUMAR DEB AGENT NETWORK TRAVELS HAILAKANDI TOWN WARD NO. 11 P.O. HAILAKANDI P.S. HAILAKANDI DIST. HAILAKANDI ASSAM PIN 78815 For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. M. J. Quadir, Advocate For the Respondent(s) : Mr. S. K. Ghosh, Advocate BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DEVASHIS BARUAH
Source: High Court of Gauhati, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.