- Court
- High Court of Gauhati
- Decided
- 30 May 2024
- Bench
- S. Justice Mitali Thakuria
- Case no.
- Crl.L.P. 23/2022
Judgment
ORDER Date : 31-05-2024 Heard Mr. D. Chakarborty, learned counsel for the appellant as well as Mr. S. Muktar, learned counsel for the respondent.
¶2This is an application filed under section 378(4) of Cr.P.C. praying for Page No.# 2/3 special leave to prefer the appeal against the order of acquittal against the judgment and order dated 11.01.2022 passed in CR case no.316/2014 under section 138 of the NI Act.
¶3It is submitted by the learned counsel for the appellant that the appellant had filed the case under section 138 of the NIA Act where the documents were exhibited but inadvertently the postal receipt dated 24.03.2014 was exhibited as Ext.4 instead of the correct postal receipt dated 11.03.2014. Coming to know about the said inadvertent mistake a petition was also filed before the learned Court below but the same was rejected and judgment was passed whereby the present respondent was acquitted.
¶4Hence, he had preferred the connected appeal against the order of acquittal and accordingly the present leave petition has been preferred to grant leave of the Court to register the appeal against the judgment and order passed by the learned trial Court.
¶5Mr. S. Muktar, learned counsel for the respondent submits that 30 opportunities were given to the petitioner's side but he did not avail those opportunities and thus violated the provision of section 138B of the NIA Act and on the basis of which the judgment was passed by the learned Court below. Thus he raised objection in allowing the present leave petition to prefer the appeal against the order of acquittal.
¶6Hearing the submission made by the learned counsel for both sides, I find it justified to allow the present petition to prefer an appeal against the Page No.# 3/3 order of acquittal.
¶7Accordingly leave is granted and the Registry is directed to register and number the connected appeal.
¶8List accordingly.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant
Case details
Parties and counsel
Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010060952022 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Crl.L.P./23/2022 RAGHU NATH BARUAH S/O LATE KRISHNA RAM BARUAH RESIDENT OF VILLAGE BHATTAPARA, CHHAYGAON, PO CHAMPAK NAGAR, PS CHHAYGAON, DIST KAMRUP ASSAM 781124 VERSUS MANORANJAN BHAGAWATI S/O SRI NARODEV SARMAH RESIDENT OF VILLAGE PACHAMTOLA, PO CHAMPAK NAGAR, PS CHHAYGAON, DIST KAMRUP ASSAM 781124 Advocate for the Petitioner : MR P KATAKI Advocate for the Respondent : MR S MUKTAR BEFORE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE MITALI THAKURIA
Source: High Court of Gauhati, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.