VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Gauhati High Court 2024 › High Court of Gauhati

Jyotirmoy Baruah v. The State of Assam

Disposed Of
Court
High Court of Gauhati
Decided
22 April 2024
Bench
Arun Dev Choudhuryauthor
Case no.
AB 891/2022

Judgment

ORDER

23.04.2024

Heard Mr. P. Deka learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. P. Borthakur, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State of Assam. By this Application under Section 438 of the Cr.P.C., the petitioner namely, Sri Jyotirmoy Baruah is seeking pre-arrest bail in connection with complaint petition to the Addl. Director of Police, Vigilance and Anti-Corruption, Assam and Special Director General of Police, Vigilance and Anti-Corruption, Assam vide C/R No. 2454 dated

28.09.2021. This Court vide order dated 08.04.2022 has granted interim protection to the petitioner while calling for the case diary. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has appeared before the Investigating Officer after the interim protection was granted by this Court under its order dated 08.04.2022 and recorded his statement and co-operated with the investigation. The case diary as called for has been received and perused the same. The case diary reveals that the investigation has sufficiently progressed, statement of witnesses under Section 161 of Cr.P.C. have been recorded and certain documents have also been seized. The case diary further reveals that after interim protection granted by this Court, the petitioner has fully cooperated with the investigating agency and no material has been placed on record to suggest any likelihood of absconding of the petitioner. Page No.# 3/3 After perusal of the case diary, this Court is of the opinion that stage of investigation, does not warrant custodial interrogation at this stage inasmuch as the petitioner has cooperated with the investigating agency. Therefore, in the totality of the matter, the interim protection granted under order dated 08.04.2022 is made absolute subject to further condition that the petitioner shall make himself available for interrogation if the investigating officer calls for and also continues to cooperate with the investigation. Accordingly, this bail application stands disposed of. Case diary be returned back. JUDGE Comparing Assistant

Case details

Parties and counsel

Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010132212022 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : AB/891/2022 JYOTIRMOY BARUAH S/O SRI ARUN BARUAH R/O VILL- UDALGURI SHANTI ROAD WARD NO. 04 P.O. AND P.S. UDALGURI BTR ASSAM PIN--784509 VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM REP. BY THE LEARNED PP ASSAM ------------ Advocate for : MR. P DEKA Advocate for : PP ASSAM appearing for THE STATE OF ASSAM Page No.# 2/3 BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN DEV CHOUDHURY

Source: High Court of Gauhati, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.