VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Gauhati High Court 2024 › High Court of Gauhati

Rubul Das v. The State of Assam

Disposed Of
Court
High Court of Gauhati
Decided
21 April 2024
Bench
Robin Phukanauthor
Case no.
AB 811/2024

Judgment

ORDER

22.04.2024 Heard Mr. R. Sarma, learned counsel for the applicant and also heard Ms. N. Das, learned Additional Public Prosecutor, Assam, appearing for the State respondent.

¶2Apprehending arrest in connection with Bhangagarh P.S. Case No.26/2024 under Section 120B/420/406/468 IPC, this application under Section 438 Cr.P.C. is preferred by applicant, namely, Rubul Das, for grant of pre-arrest bail.

¶3The above-noted case has been registered on the basis of an FIR lodged by one Vishnu Priya Hazarika, on 29.01.2024. The essence of allegation made in the aforesaid Page No.# 2/2 FIR is that one Anima Sarkar has prepared one false power of attorney on 19.11.2019 and sold the land belonging to the informant.

¶4Mr. Sarma, learned counsel for the applicant submits that this Court vide order dated 01.04.2024 was pleased to extend the privilege of interim pre-arrest bail to the applicant and pursuant to the said order, the applicant had appeared before the I.O. and cooperating with the investigating agency and therefore, a contention is being made that the interim order dated 01.04.2024, may be made absolute, in the same terms and conditions.

¶5On the other hand, Ms. N. Das, learned Additional Public Prosecutor, Assam, has produced the case diary before this Court and confirmed appearance of the applicant before the I.O. Ms. Das further submits that investigation of the case has almost been completed.

¶6Having heard the submission of learned Advocates of both sides, I have carefully gone through the petition and the documents placed on record and also perused the case diary with the assistance of Ms. Das, learned Additional P.P.

¶7It appears that the applicant has been cooperating with the investigating agency and he appeared before the I.O. and his statement is also recorded and further it appears that material part of the investigation is almost over. That being so, custodial interrogation of the applicant seems to be not warranted here in this case and therefore, this Court is inclined to make the interim order dated 01.04.2024, absolute, in the same terms and conditions. Case diary be returned.

¶8In terms of above, this anticipatory bail application stands disposed of. Comparing Assistant Sd/- Robin Phukan JUDGE

Case details

Parties and counsel

Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010064452024 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : AB/811/2024 RUBUL DAS S/O SRI MANORANJAN DAS, R/O VILL- ABHOYPUR, P.O.-COLLEGE NAGAR, P.S.-CHANGSARI, DIST- KAMRUP, ASSAM VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, ASSAM Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. R SARMA Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM BEFORE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ROBIN PHUKAN

Source: High Court of Gauhati, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.