Bhaben Borah and Anr v. The State of Assam and 2 Ors

PageoNo.#o1/2 GAHC010064882024 ooooooo ooooooooooooooo ooooooooooooooooTHEoGAUHATIoHIGHoCOURTo (HIGHoCOURToOFoASSAM,oNAGALAND,oMIZORAMoANDoARUNACHALoPRADESH)o CaseoNo.o:oI.A.(Civil)/977/2024o BHABENoBORAHoANDoANRo S/O-oLATEoNARENDRAoNATHoBORAH,oR/O-oVILL.-oCHAKARIoGAON,oP.O.o DIMARUGURI,oP.S.oSADARo(NAGAON),oDIST.oNAGAON,oASSAM,oPIN-o 781003. 2:oNABAJYOTIoHOMAGAIN oS/O-oLATEoCHABILALoHOMAGAIN oR/O-oVILL.-oRANGCHALI oDALANI oP.O.oANDoP.S.oBEHALI oDIST.oBISWANATH oASSAM,oPIN-o784166o VERSUSo THEoSTATEoOFoASSAMoANDo2oORSo REPRESENTEDoBYoTHEoCOMMISSIONERoANDoSECRETARYoTOoTHEoPUBLIC HEALTHoENGINEERINGoDEPARTMENT,oGOVT.oOFoASSAM,oDISPURo GUWAHATIo06 2:DIRECTORoGENERALoOFoPOLICE oASSAM oB.K.oKATAKIoROAD oULUBARI,oGUWAHATI. 3:DIRECTORoGENERALoOFoCIVILoDEFENCE oANDoCOMMANDANToGENERALoOFoHOMEoGUARDS oASSAM,oBELTOLA oGUWAHATIo AdvocateoforotheoPetitionerooooo:oMSoRoNATHo AdvocateoforotheoRespondento:oGA,oASSAMoo oooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo Page No.# 2/2 BEFORE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE LANUSUNGKUM JAMIR :: O R D E R :: 05-04-2024 Heard Mr. K. Biswakarma, learned counsel for the applicants. By this application, the applicant is praying for impleadment of Samilal Kr. Brahma, Indrajit Hasnu, Debajyoti Bathari, Anukul Sinha, Sunil Panging, Sapal Sarmah, Chandra Knt. Malakar, Arabinda Mandal, Tarikuddin Ahmed, Joykanta Talukdar, Rabin Saikia, Pabitra Kr. Roy, Moni Ram Ligira, Arun Kr. Borah, Md. Nizamuddin Raj Barbhuyan, Mohini Mohan Sarmah, Binoy Kr. Dewri, Prafulla Gogoi, Anil Ch. Borah, Bolendra Nath Brahma, Joy Ram Nath, Nil Kishore Boro, Gahindra Chandra Roy and Abdus Salam, under the office of the Director General of Civil Defence and Commandant General of Home Guards, Beltola, Guwahati, Assam, Pin-781028, as party respondent Nos. 4 to 27 respectively in the connected WP(C) No. 613/2024, on the ground that the applicants are challenging the final gradation list of Subedars of Home Guard Organization and the interest of the aforesaid parties would be affected if the writ petition is allowed. Mr. R. Talukdar, learned Government Advocate appearing for the respondent Nos. 1 to 3 has no objection to the prayer so made. This Court has considered the cause shown in the present application and is satisfied. Accordingly, the prayer for impleadment is allowed. The interlocutory application is accordingly disposed of. JUDGE Comparing Assistant