- Court
- High Court of Gauhati
- Decided
- 17 March 2024
- Bench
- Michael Zothankhuma
- Case no.
- WP(C) 2655/2021
Judgment
ORDER
18.03.2024
¶1Heard Ms. A. Bora, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. N. Kalita, learned counsel for the respondent nos.1, 2 & 4 and Mr. A.N. Sharma, learned counsel for the respondent no.3.
¶2The writ petitioner is aggrieved with the Notice sent to the petitioner, directing them to pay rent for their industrial shed in Industrial Estate, Bongaigaon @Rs.1/- per sq.ft and Rs.0.15 paisa per sq.ft. for the open spaces with retrospective effect from 07.01.2000.
¶3The petitioner's counsel submits that the present case is covered by the order dated 29.01.2024 passed in WP(C) 4507/2015, which in turn has been made in pursuant to the order dated 28.10.2013 passed in WP(C) No.2199/2008. She accordingly submits that the present case may be disposed of in terms of the order dated 29.01.2024 passed in WP(C) 4507/2015.
¶4The counsels for the respondents submit that the present case is covered by the order dated 29.01.2024 passed in WP(C) 4507/2015 and accordingly a similar order can be passed in the present case.
Page No.# 3/3
¶5I have heard the learned counsels for the parties.
¶6In view of the consent of the learned counsels for the parties, this writ petition is also disposed of in the same line as the order dated 29.01.2024 passed in WP(C) 4507/2015, which has been made in terms of the order dated
28.10.2013 passed in WP(C) No.2199/2008.
¶7Accordingly, this writ petition is disposed of as follows :
(i) This Court is not inclined to interfere with the increase in the lease rent with effect from 01.05.2008 and, as such, the Respondent AIIDC would be at liberty to collect the rent at the said enhanced rate with effect from 01.05.2008.
(ii) This Court, taking into account the orders passed by the Coordinate Bench of this Court, interferes with the action of the respondent authorities in imposing enhanced rate of rent with effect from the year 2000 till 30.04.2008. Under such circumstances, the respondent AIIDC is restrained from collecting any rent at the enhanced rate from the petitioners for the period up to 30.04.2008
JUDGE Comparing Assistant
Case details
Parties and counsel
PageoNo.#o1/3 GAHC010065122021 ooooooo ooooooooooooooo ooooooooooooooooTHEoGAUHATIoHIGHoCOURTo (HIGHoCOURToOFoASSAM,oNAGALAND,oMIZORAMoANDoARUNACHALoPRADESH)o CaseoNo.o:oWP(C)/2655/2021o M/SoG.oK.oAGROoINDUSTRIESo INDUSTRIALoESTTE,oNEWoBONGAIGAON,oDIST.-oBONGAIGAON,oASSAM,o REP.oBYoITSoPROPRIETOR,oNIRMALoKUMARoGOLCHA,oAGEDoABOUTo YEARS,oS/O-oKESHRAoCHANDoGOLCHA,oR/O-oBONGAIGAON,oP.O.,oP.S.oANDo DIST.-oBONGAIGAON,oASSAM VERSUSo THEoSTATEoOFoASSAMoANDo3oORSo THROUGH-oTHEoSECRETARY,oTOoTHEoGOVT.oOFoASSAM,oDEPTT.oOFo INDUSTRIES,oDISPUR,oGHY-6 2:THEoDIRECTORoOFoINDUSTRIES oASSAM oBAMUNIMAIDAN oGHY-21 3:THEoMANAGINGoDIRECTOR oASSAMoINDUSTRIALoINFRASTRUCTUREoDEVELOPMENToCORPORATION o(AoGOVT.oOFoASSAMoUNDERTAKING) oBAMUNIMAIDAN oGHY-21 4:THEoGENERALoMANAGER oDISTRICToINDUSTRIESoANDoCOMMERCEoCENTRE oBONGAIGAON oP.O.oBONGAIGAON oDIST.-oBONGAIGAON oASSAo AdvocateoforotheoPetitionerooooo:oMR.oSoCoBISWASo Page No.# 2/3 Advocate for the Respondent : SC, INDUSTRIES BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MICHAEL ZOTHANKHUMA
Source: High Court of Gauhati, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.