VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Gauhati High Court 2023 › High Court of Gauhati

Ezzat Ali and 9 Ors v. The State of Assam and Anr

Disposed Of
Court
High Court of Gauhati
Decided
24 March 2023
Bench
S. Justice Susmita Phukan Khaundauthor
Case no.
Crl.Pet. 287/2023

Judgment

ORDER Date : 24-03-2023 Heard Mr. S Islam, learned counsel for the petitioners. Also heard Ms. S.H Bora, learned Addl. PP, appearing for the State respondent No.1.

¶2The petitioners, namely, 1. Ezzat Ali, 2. Sirag Ali, 3. Lalchand Ali, 4. Hobibur Rahman, 5. Jamaluddin, 6. Jamal Ali, 7. Sayed Ai, 8. Wahab Ali, 9. Hasem Ali and 10. Akher Ali have filed an application under section 482 Cr.P.C., with a prayer for quashing and setting aside the impugned order dated 16.03.2023, passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Bilasipara in Sessions Case No.168/2012.

¶3The learned Addl. PP has accepted notice on behalf of the respondent No.1 and has also received a copy of the petition.

¶4I have considered the submissions at the bar.

¶5It is submitted on behalf of the petitioners that in the instant case, the prosecution has examined 20 prosecution witnesses and 6 defence witnesses. On two occasions the arguments of the case was advanced before the predecessors of the present Additional Sessions Judge and the present Additional Sessions Judge joined at Bilasipara in the month of August, 2022. The prosecution reopened the case on

18.08.2022 and the first argument was advanced for the petitioners Page No.# 4/5 on 08.09.2022 and the next date was fixed on 03.11.2022 for argument. The argument was advanced on 03.11.2022 but due to paucity of time the arguments could not be completed and the next date was fixed on 11.02.2022. Meanwhile, the Trial Court could not function due to pen down by the Bilasipara Bar Association from

07.11.2022 up to 11.01.2023. The case was finally fixed for argument on 16.03.2023 and the impugned order was passed on 16.03.2023.

¶6It was observed by the learned Trial Court that arguments had been heard on several occasions and so no more time could be allowed to the defence counsel who was not well on the date fixed for argument i.e., 16.03.2023.

¶7The learned counsel for the petitioners have annexed copies of documents on behalf of the learned defence counsel representing the petitioners at the trial Court in Sessions Case No.168/2012. The medical documents are marked as Annexure – 2 which are appended along with the petition of the learned defence counsel for the petitioners who was advised to take bed rest due to eye surgery.

¶8I have considered the submissions at the bar. This case is a long pending case, continuing from the year 2012. It is true that arguments have been heard on several dates, but at the same time it is also true that the defence could not conclude the argument due to the eye surgery of the learned defence counsel. For the interest of justice, both the sides are to be heard. The petitioners have prayed for only one date to conclude the argument.

¶9In view of my foregoing discussions, I deem it expedient to invoke the inherent jurisdiction under section 482 Cr.P.C. For interest Page No.# 5/5 of justice, the order dated 16.03.2023 fixing the case for judgment is hereby set aside. The petitioners are afforded a last opportunity to conclude the argument within one day to be fixed by the learned trial Court.

¶10In terms of the above, the petition stands disposed of.

JUDGE Comparing Assistant

Case details

Parties and counsel

PageoNo.#o1/5 GAHC010065282023 ooooooo ooooooooooooooo ooooooooooooooooTHEoGAUHATIoHIGHoCOURTo (HIGHoCOURToOFoASSAM,oNAGALAND,oMIZORAMoANDoARUNACHALoPRADESH)o CaseoNo.o:oCrl.Pet./287/2023o EZZAToALIoANDo9oORS.o S/OoLATEoFULoMOHAMMADoSK.o R/OoDIRERoCHARoPART-I,o P.S.oCHAPORo DIST.oDHUBRI,oASSAM 2:oSIRAJoALI oS/OoLATEoMOKBULoHUSSAINo R/OoDIRERoCHARoPART-Io P.S.oCHAPORo DIST.oDHUBRI oASSAM 3:oLALCHANDoALI oS/OoLATEoSAMSULoHOQUEo R/OoKHORSIMARIo P.S.oPANCHARATNAo DIST.oDHUBRI oASSAM 4:oHOBIBURoRAHMAN oS/OLATEoJADUoSK.o R/OoCHANDIRoPARAo P.S.oCHAPORo DIST.oDHUBRI oASSAM 5:oJAMALUDDIN oS/OoLT.oDOSToMOHAMMADo R/OoLALIYAPARAo P.S.oCHAPORo DIST.oDHUBRI oASSAM PageoNo.#o2/5 6:oJAMALoALI oS/OoLATEoNAIMUDDINoSK.o R/OoCHANDIRPARAo P.S.oCHAPORo DIST.oDHUBRI oASSAM 7:oSAYEDoALI oS/OoLATEoCHANDULLoSK.o R/OoCHANDIRPARAo P.S.oCHAPORo DIST.oDHUBRI oASSAM 8:oWAHABoALI oS/OoLATEoROSTAMoALIo R/OoKHORSIMARIo P.S.oPACHARATNAo DIST.oDHUBRI oASSAM 9:oHASEMoALI oS/OoAKHERoALIo R/oDIRERoCHARoPART-I o P.S.oCHAPARo DIST.oDHUBRI oASSAM 10:oAKHERoALI oS/OoLATEoMOZIBORoMONDALo R/OoHALDIYAPARAo P.S.oCHAPORo DIST.oDHUBRI oASSAo VERSUSo THEoSTATEoOFoASSAMoANDoANR.o REP.oBYoTHEoPP,oASSAM 2:MAHARoALI oS/OoLATEoBARANoALIo R/OoKHARSIMARIo P.O.oANDoP.S.oJOGIGHOPAo DIST.oBONGAIGAON oASSAMo PIN-78338o Page No.# 3/5 Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. S ISLAM Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM BEFORE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE SUSMITA PHUKAN KHAUND

Source: High Court of Gauhati, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.