- Court
- High Court of Gauhati
- Decided
- 18 June 2024
- Bench
- S. Justice Mitali Thakuria
- Case no.
- AB 839/2024
Judgment
ORDER Date : 19.06.2024 Heard Mr. R. B. Gohain, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. R. Borthakur, learned Standing Counsel, Forest Department. This is an application under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, seeking privilege of pre-arrest bail the for the accused/petitioner, namely, Motio Narzary who is apprehending arrest in Page No.# 2/3 connection with O.R. Case No. AMT/2014 dated 12.08.2023 registered under Sections 9/ 31/ 35(6)/ 35(8)/ 39 and 49(B) of the Wild Life (Protection) Act, 1972. CD received, perused the same and heard both the sides. It is submitted by Mr. R. B. Gohain, learned counsel for the petitioner that the present petitioner is innocent and it is nowhere involved in the alleged offence. Further, in the complaint petition there is no allegation has been brought against the present petitioner. More so, after obtaining the order of pre-arrest bail dated 01.04.2024, he appear before the Investigation Officer and co-operate in the investigation of this case. He is still ready and will co-operate the Investigating Officer in further investigation of this case, if he is grated with the privilege of pre-arrest bail. In the context, Mr. R. Borthakur, learned Standing Counsel, Forest Department submitted that he appear before the Investigating Officer and co-operate in the investigation of this case, his statement is also recorded by the Investigating Officer in connection of this case. He further submitted that considering the materials available in the case, his prayer may be allowed. However, his co-operation may be needed and the accused may be directed accordingly. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsels for both sides and on perusal of the case diary, I find that custodial interrogation of the present accused petitioner is not required in further investigation of this case, however he is directed to appear before the Investigating Officer as and when his presence will be required. In view of above, the interim pre-arrest bail dated 01.04.2024 is hereby Page No.# 3/3 made absolute in the same terms and conditions.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant
Case details
Parties and counsel
Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010066032024 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : AB/839/2024 MOTIO NARZARY S/O ANTENG NARZARY, R/O DWIMUGURI, P.O.-MALIVITA, P.S.-AMGURI, DIST- CHIRANG, PIN-783393, ASSAM VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM REPRESENTED BY THE SPECIAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, ASSAM Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. R B GOHAIN Advocate for the Respondent : SC, FOREST BEFORE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE MITALI THAKURIA
Source: High Court of Gauhati, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.