- Court
- High Court of Gauhati
- Decided
- 5 May 2024
- Bench
- S. Justice Mitali Thakuria
- Case no.
- AB 867/2024
Judgment
ORDER Date : 06-05-2024
¶1Heard Mr. G. Phukan, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. M.P. Goswami, the learned Addl. PP appearing on behalf of the State respondent.
¶2This is an application under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, praying for grant of pre-arrest bail to the accused/petitioner, namely, Amit Biswakarma @ Amrit Biswakarma who is apprehending arrest in connection with Silapathar P.S. Case No. 51/2024, under Sections 294/376/420 of the Indian Penal Code. Page No.# 2/2
¶3It is submitted by Mr. Phukan, learned counsel for the petitioner that after obtaining the interim pre-arrest bail on 03.04.2024, the petitioner appeared before the IO and co-operated in the investigation of this case and his statement is also recorded u/s 161 Cr.PC . More so, as he has already co-operated with the IO and considering the nature of offences, his custodial interrogation is not at all necessary in this case. Accordingly it is prayed to make the interim pre-arrest bail order absolute.
¶4In this regard, Mr. Sharma, the learned Addl. PP has submitted that from the material on record, it is seen that he has co-operated with the IO. As per the statement of the victim she had a love affair with the petitioner since last 4 years and on the day of the incident also she eloped with him by her own. However, she has stated that he forcefully had physical relationship with the victim.
¶5After hearing the submissions made by the learned counsels of both sides and also considering the entire aspects of the case, nature of allegation as well as the conduct of the accused/petitioner, I find it a fit case to extend the privilege of pre-arrest bail to the accused/petitioner. Accordingly, the interim pre-arrest bail order, granted to the accused/petitioner vide order dated
03.04.2024, is hereby made absolute with a direction to the accused/petitioner to co-operate with the I.O. in further investigation of the case. In terms of above, this anticipatory bail application stands disposed of. The Case Diary be sent back.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant
Case details
Parties and counsel
Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010066812024 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : AB/867/2024 AMIT BISWAKARMA @ AMRIT BISWAKARMA S/O SHRI BHOJ BDR. BISWAKARMA, R/O VILL- PITHAGURI DOUL, P.O.- KUSUMTOLA, P.S.-JAMUGURI, DIST- SONITPUR, ASSAM VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, ASSAM Advocate for the Petitioner : MR G PHUKAN Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM BEFORE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE MITALI THAKURIA
Source: High Court of Gauhati, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.