- Court
- High Court of Gauhati
- Decided
- 18 June 2024
- Bench
- Vijay Bishnoi, Kardak Ete
- Case no.
- I.A.(Civil) 1041/2024
Judgment
Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010067672024
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/1041/2024 In Cus.Ref. No.1362/2024 (Filing Number) COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS (PREVENTIVE) NORTH EASTERN REGION SHILLONG 110 MAHATMA GANDHI ROAD SHILLONG 793001, MEGHALAYA VERSUS SRI ANIL KUMAR JAIN, S/O LATE RATANLAL JAIN PROPRIETOR OF M.S TANSUKHRAI RATANLAL JEWELLERS SHOPPERS POINT, J.N ROAD, CHAIGALI ,FANCY BAZAR, GUWAHATI For the Applicant(s) : Mr. S.C. Keyal, Standing Counsel, Customs. For the Respondent(s) : ………………………. – BEFORE – HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. VIJAY BISHNOI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KARDAK ETE
19.06.2024 (Vijay Bishnoi, CJ)
As per office report, notice of this Interlocutory Application has been served upon the sole respondent. However, none has appeared on behalf of the sole respondent. The present Interlocutory Application is filed by the applicant under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963 with a prayer to condone the delay of 4(four) days occasioned in preferring the connected Custom Reference. Page No.# 2/2 Having heard the learned counsel appearing for the applicant and after going through the contents of the application, we deem it appropriate to condone the delay of 4(four) days occasioned in preferring the connected custom reference. Hence, the application is allowed and the delay of 4(four) days occasioned in preferring the connected Custom Reference is condoned. The Registry is directed to register the connected Custom Reference and list the same for admission after the ensuing summer vacation.
JUDGE CHIEF JUSTICE Comparing Assistant
Source: High Court of Gauhati, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.