VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Gauhati High Court 2023 › High Court of Gauhati

Sohidul Islam v. The State of Assam

Disposed Of
Court
High Court of Gauhati
Decided
28 April 2023
Bench
Soumitra Saikiaauthor
Case no.
Bail Appln. 1237/2023

Judgment

ORDER Date : 28.04.2023 Heard Mr. A. Roshid, learned counsel appears for the petitioner. Also heard Ms. S. H. Borah, learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the State of Assam. Page No.# 2/4

¶2The bail application has been preferred by the petitioner, Sohidul Islam seeking bail as he is arrested in connection with Jogighopa P.S. Case No. 79/2023 registered under Sections 363 of IPC added Section 306 of IPC.

¶3The petitioner is arrested on 27.02.2023 and have been in custody since then.

¶4An FIR dated 22.02.2023 was lodged by the informant, one, Rofikul Islam, stated that his sister one, Almina Khatun, aged about 16 years left her home and was missing. Although they had searched for her but she was not found. Subsequently, her body was recovered from the river Brahmaputra under the Jogighopa Bridge. It is suspected that she had committed suicide. During the investigation, the petitioner was arrested. It is suspected that the petitioner and the deceased were in a relationship and as their marriage did not take place it may have led to the deceased to commit suicide. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner is in no way connected with the offences alleged. He has co-operated with the Investigating officer during the investigation and statements have been recorded and considering the period of detention, there is no further requirement for the petitioner to be kept in the custody.

¶5Ms. S. H. Borah, learned Addl. P.P has produced the case dairy before this Court. It is submitted that the FSL Report is not received although the Post Mortem Report is available. Page No.# 3/4

¶6Case Diary produced has been carefully perused.

¶7The matter has been investigated by the police but the charge-sheet has not been filed. Petitioner has been in custody for about 59 days.

¶8There are no materials to suggest that release of the petitioners at this stage will cause impediment to the investigations carried on by the police. Considering the extent of investigation undertaken by the police, this Court is of the view that although charge-sheet has not been filed, further custodial detention of the petitioner in connection with the investigation of the aforementioned case is not necessary.

¶9Accordingly, this Bail petition is allowed. The petitioner is directed to be released on bail forthwith subject to executing a bail bond of Rs.30,000/-(Rupees thirty thousand) only with 1 local surety of like amount subject to the satisfaction of the S.D.J.M, Abhayapuri. The bail, granted however, is subjected to the following conditions:-

i) The petitioner shall continue to appear before the Investigating Officer once a month and cooperate with the Investigating Officer as and when required, till completion of investigation.

ii) The petitioner shall not change his residence or place of business, without prior written permission from the Court of S.D.J.M, Abhayapuri.

iii) That the petitioner shall not hamper or Page No.# 4/4 tamper with the investigation in any manner; and

iv) That the petitioner shall not, directly or indirectly, make any inducement, threat or promise to any person/witness acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him/her from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer in connection to this Police Station Case.

¶10If any of the conditions are found to be violated by the petitioner then the Investigating Officer shall be at liberty to seek cancellation of the bail granted to the accused.

¶11With the above direction, the bail petition is accordingly allowed and disposed of.

¶12Return the case dairy.

JUDGE Comparing Assistant

Case details

Parties and counsel

Page No.# 1/4 GAHC010068972023 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Bail Appln./1237/2023 SOHIDUL ISLAM S/O OSMAT ALI VILL- SEDAMARI P.O. AND P.S. JOGIGHOPA DIST. BONGAIGAON, ASSAM PIN-783382 VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM REP. BY THE PP, ASSAM Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. A ROSHID Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SOUMITRA SAIKIA

Source: High Court of Gauhati, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.