- Court
- High Court of Gauhati
- Decided
- 7 April 2024
- Bench
- S. Justice Malasri Nandi
- Case no.
- Bail Appln. 1016/2024
Judgment
ORDER Date : 08 .04. 2024 Heard Mr. AK Ahmed, learned counsel for the petitioners and Mr. PD Goswami, learned Addl. Public Prosecutor for the State respondent. This is an application under Section 439 Cr.P.C., filed by the petitioners namely, Sultan Ali, Ajibjur Rahman and Nabi Hussain, praying for bail, who were arrested on 21.03.2024 in connection with Basistha P.S. Case No. 173/2024 under Sections 120B/ 379 of IPC read with Section 11(1)(d) of the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act, 1960, read with Sections 13(1)/16 of the Assam Cattle Preservation Act, 2021. Heard both sides. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioners that the petitioner No. 1 is the owner of alto vehicle bearing registration No. AS-12 AD 5085 and petitioner No. 2 is his friend. The allegation made against the petitioner No. 1 is that he has escorted a truck bearing registration No. AS-O1 JC 9963 from which, 14 numbers of cattle were recovered. The petitioner No. 3 is the driver of the truck. The petitioners were in custody since last 20 days and seized cattle have already been recovered. The petitioners may be enlarged on bail. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor has submitted that the charge sheet has not yet been submitted and the accused/ petitioners may be enlarged on bail considering the period of detention. In view of the above, considering the materials available on the record including the length of detention I find that further custodial interrogation of the Page No.# 3/3 accused/petitioners may not be required. It is directed that the accused/ petitioners be released on bail on furnishing a bond of Rs. 20,000/- each with a suitable surety each of like amount to the satisfaction of the learned CJM, Kamrup (Metro), Guwahqti in connection with the aforementioned case. The direction for bail is further subject to the conditions that the accused-petitioner:
(a) shall not hamper with the investigation and tamper with the evidence of the case; and
(b) shall not, directly or indirectly, make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer. In terms of the above, this bail application stands disposed of.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant
Case details
Parties and counsel
PageoNo.#o1/3 GAHC010069252024 ooooooo ooooooooooooooo ooooooooooooooooTHEoGAUHATIoHIGHoCOURTo (HIGHoCOURToOFoASSAM,oNAGALAND,oMIZORAMoANDoARUNACHALoPRADESH)o CaseoNo.o:oBailoAppln./1016/2024o SULTANoALIoANDo2oORS.o S/OoAKBARoALIo R/OoKOPATIGAON,oP.S.oDALGAONo DIST.oDARRANG,oASSAM 2:oAJIBURoRAHMAN oS/OoJAHURoALIo R/OoDOIPAM oP.S.oDALGAONo DIST.oDARRANG oASSAM 3:oNABIoHUSSAIN oS/OoABUoTALEBo R/OoMAUCHITAoGASORoGORo P.S.oDHULAo DIST.oDARRANG oASSAMo MOBILEoNO.o9864027090o PIN-78414o VERSUSo THEoSTATEoOFoASSAMo TOoBEoREPoBYoTHEoLEARNEDoPP,oASSAM AdvocateoforotheoPetitionerooooo:oMRoAoKoAHMEDo AdvocateoforotheoRespondento:oo oooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo Page No.# 2/3 BEFORE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE MALASRI NANDI
Source: High Court of Gauhati, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.