VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Gauhati High Court 2024 › High Court of Gauhati

Jamiul Aktar Ahmed v. The State of Assam

Disposed Of
Court
High Court of Gauhati
Decided
21 July 2024
Bench
S. Justice Susmita Phukan Khaundauthor
Case no.
AB 887/2024

Judgment

ORDER Date : 22-07-2024

Heard Mr. R. Bora, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. M.P. Goswami, learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the State respondent.

¶2This is an application under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, praying for grant of pre-arrest bail to the accused/petitioner, namely Jamiul Aktar Ahmed who is apprehending arrest in connection with Page No.# 2/2 Kokrajhar P.S. Case No.60/2024 under Sections 338/304/34 IPC.

¶3It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that he is the owner of the M/S Sakal Brick Industry and an unfortunate incident had happened while construction of the wall was going on and some persons got injured and two persons died due to the injury sustained by them. However, the petitioner being the owner of the said industry took all the responsibility of the treatment of those injured as well as deceased. But subsequently, two of the injured succumbed to their injuries. He being the owner of the said industry he is no way connected with the offence or there was no negligence on his part. However, he is ready and willing to cooperate with the I/O for further investigation of the case if he is granted the privilege of interim pre-arrest bail.

¶4The learned Additional Public Prosecutor has submitted that the victims have died as the wall had collapsed.

¶5I have also scrutinized the Case Diary.

¶6The petitioner is the owner of M/S Sakal Brick Industry and he has appeared before the Investigating Officer and has cooperated with the investigation. He has not violated any bail conditions. Investigation has progressed to a considerable extent.

¶7The interim order passed by the Coordinate Bench of this Court in this case on 04.04.2024 is hereby made absolute.

¶8Send back the Case Diary.

¶9In terms of the above observations, this Anticipatory Bail application stands disposed of. JUDGE Comparing Assistant

Case details

Parties and counsel

Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010069742024 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : AB/887/2024 JAMIUL AKTAR AHMED S/O JALAL UDDIN AHMED, R/O VILL- KOLLAR KHAL, P.S.-CHAPAR, DIST- DHUBRI, ASSAM VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, ASSAM Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. D GOGOI Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM BEFORE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE SUSMITA PHUKAN KHAUND

Source: High Court of Gauhati, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.