Dr. Basanta Laskar, v. Mr. Avinash P. Joshi,

ORDER Date : 26.06.2024

Heard the petitioner-in-person as well as Mr. A. Chaliha, learned counsel for the opposite party. By filing this interlocutory application, the petitioner-in-person seeking direction upon the respondent to pay 6% simple interest on the delayed salary and non-practicing allowance. In the context to the prayer made by the petitioner-in-person, the Court is of the considered opinion that in a contempt proceeding, the Court is required to enforce the order in respect of which contempt is alleged. It will not be within the jurisdiction of this Court while in sesin of a contempt petition to add or subtract to the directions already issued in the order dated 08.03.2019 passed in WP(C) 5471/2019. Accordingly, the Court is of the considered opinion that the prayer of the petitioner-in-person cannot be considered. Hence, this interlocutory application stands dismissed.

JUDGE Comparing Assistant

PageoNo.#o1/2 GAHC010119352022 ooooooo ooooooooooooooo ooooooooooooooooTHEoGAUHATIoHIGHoCOURTo (HIGHoCOURToOFoASSAM,oNAGALAND,oMIZORAMoANDoARUNACHALoPRADESH)o CaseoNo.o:oI.A.(Civil)/910/2023 DR.oBASANTAoLASKAR RETIREDoPROFESSORoOFoMEDICINE oASSAMoMEDICALoCOLLEGE oDIBRUGARH oR/O.oPROFESSORSoQUARTER oNECoCOMPOUNDo ASSAMoMEDICALoCOLLEGEoCAMPUS oDIBRUGARH oASSAM oPINo786032. oVERSUS MR.oAVINASHoP.oJOSHI PRINCIPALoSECRETARY oHEALTHoANDoFAMILYoWELFARE oGOVT.oOFoASSAM o3RDoFLOOR oCMoBLOCK oASSAMoSECRETARIAT oDISPUR oPIN-781006. o------------ oAdvocateoforo:oPETITIONERoINoPERSON Advocateoforo:oMRoAoCHALIHAoappearingoforoMR.oAVINASHoP.oJOSHI ooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo Page No.# 2/2 BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KALYAN RAI SURANA