- Court
- High Court of Gauhati
- Decided
- 3 May 2023
- Bench
- Ajit Borthakur
- Case no.
- Bail Appln. 1214/2023
Judgment
ORDER Date : 03.05.2023
Heard Mr. R. P. Sarmah, learned counsel appearing for the accused petitioner as well as Mr. R. J. Baruah, learned Addl. P.P., Assam appearing for the State respondent. By this petition under Section 439 Cr.P.C., the accused-petitioner, namely, Anuwar Hussain, has prayed for grant of bail in connection with Batadrava P.S. Case No. 54/2022 (Sessions T1) Case No. 38(N)/2022 under Sections 120B/121/143/144/145/147/149/152/155/326/307/333/342/353/427/ 436/440/447/450/34/511 of the IPC r/w Sections 3/4 of PDPP Act. The scanned copy of the case record along with the case diary, as called for, is Page No.# 2/3 placed before the Court. The accused petitioner has been in judicial custody since 22.05.2022, i.e. for 347 days. The FIR reveals the allegation that on 21.05.2022, the informant lodged an FIR, stating, inter-alia, that on 21.05.2022 at about 3 PM, around 200 people equipped with deadly weapons, like sticks, dao and exclusive materials, such as kerosene and petrol etc., led by the FIR named accused persons, numbering 18, including the present accused petitioner, formed an unlawful assembly and trespassed into Batadrava P.S. carrying a dead body of one Safiqul and attacked the police personnel on duty at the police station. They attacked the police personnel and, as a result of physical assault, some of them sustained grievous injuries and further, set ablaze the police station causing damage to the entire office and materials therein. Perusal of the seizure memos show that large number of partially burnt fire arms and other materials were seized in connection with the case. Various expert reports show that the vehicles were damaged due to fire and the fire arms, magazines and ammunitions were burnt. There is video footage of the entire incident revealing commission of the aforesaid offences. On the other hand, medical reports show that four persons sustained injuries in the said incident. Case records reveals that charges are yet to be considered and framed by the learned Trial Court. A perusal of the case diary, including the statements of the witnesses recorded under Section 164 Cr.P.C., it is seen that there is abundance of prima facie incriminating material against the accused petitioner. Three co-accused persons have already been enlarged on bail vide order, dated
27.02.2023 passed in B.A. Nos. 3370/2023 and 356/2023. In view of the above reasons and maintaining parity in orders and further, the Page No.# 3/3 length of detention as well as there is no possibility of early completion of trial of the case, this Court is of the considered opinion that further continuation of detention of the accused petitioner in the interest of the ongoing trial of the case is not warranted. Accordingly, it is provided that the accused petitioner, named above, shall be released on bail of Rs. 1 Lakh with two sureties of like amount to the satisfaction of the learned Sessions Judge, Nagaon subject to the following conditions-
i) That the accused petitioner shall continue to appear before the learned trial Court on all dates to be fixed from time to time till the case is disposed of; and
ii) That the accused petitioner shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court; and
iii) That the accused petitioner shall refrain from committing any similar offences in future, of which he is suspected of commission; and
iv) That out of the two sureties, one must be a government servant subject to verification of the relevant documents, if deemed necessary and after such verification, the learned Court below shall return the original documents retaining legible scanned copy thereof on record for future reference. This disposes of the bail application.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant
Case details
Parties and counsel
Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010071932023 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Bail Appln./1214/2023 ANUWAR HUSSAIN S/O- LATE NURUL ISLAM, R/O- VILL- AND P.O. CHALAPATHAR, P.S. BATADRAVA, DIST.- NAGAON, ASSAM, PIN- 782122 VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM REP. BY P.P., ASSAM Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. R P SARMAH Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJIT BORTHAKUR
Source: High Court of Gauhati, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.