- Court
- High Court of Gauhati
- Decided
- 28 May 2024
- Bench
- Lanusungkum Jamir
- Case no.
- WP(C) 2009/2024
Judgment
ORDER Date : 29.05.2024
¶1Heard Mr. A. Hassan, learned counsel for the petitioners.
¶2Also heard Mr. B. Kaushik, learned standing counsel, Elementary Education Department, for respondent Nos. 1, 3, 6, 7, 9 & 10; Mr. A. Chalia, learned standing counsel, Finance Department, for respondent Nos. 2, 8 & 11; Mr. P. Chakraborty, learned standing counsel, Accountant General, for respondent No. 4 and Mr. B. Deori, learned Government Advocate, for respondent No. 5.
¶3The petitioner No. 1 was appointed temporarily as Stipendiary Teacher and posted at Gosaipather No.1 L.P. School by an order dated 30.01.1996. The petitioner No. 2 was appointed temporarily as Stipendiary Teacher and posted at Haripur L.P. School by an order dated 30.01.1996. The petitioner No. 3 was appointed temporarily as Stipendiary Teacher and posted at Uttar Besapati L.P. School by an order dated 27.01.1996. The petitioner No. 4 was appointed temporarily as Stipendiary Teacher and posted at No.1 Rownapur L.P. School by an order dated 30.01.1996. Similarly, the petitioner Nos. 5, 6 & 7 were also appointed temporarily as Stipendiary Teachers by different orders, all dated
30.01.1996 and posted at Madhabram Gogoi School L.P. School, No.51 Nakari L.P. School and Ahuchaul Gaon L.P. School respectively. Thereafter, the petitioners were deputed to undergo Junior Basic Training Course in the year, 2005, which the petitioners completed successfully. On completion of the Junior Basic Training Course, the petitioners were granted regular time scale of pay Page No.# 5/8 and other allowances by different orders dated 08.10.2007, 29.11.2005,
03.08.2007, 19.03.2005, 18.03.2008, 27.02.2008 and 05.03.2008. The services of the petitioners were also confirmed against the posts, in which, they were serving. The petitioner No. 1 was confirmed w.e.f. 05.02.2001 and the service of the petitioner Nos. 2, 5, 6 & 7 were confirmed with effect from the respective date of their initial joining. The petitioner Nos. 1, 2, 3 & 4 were also allotted the GPF account number. However, with regard to the petitioner Nos. 5, 6 & 7, they were not allotted GPF account number on the ground that they are not entitled to subscribe the GPF as they started getting regular scale pay only after
01.02.2005. Instead the petitioner Nos. 5, 6 & 7 were allotted NPS account number in the year 2010.
¶4Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the issue involved in the present case is with regard to the grant of pension under the Old Pension Scheme to the petitioners. It is submitted that the issue involved is already covered by the judgment of this Court in the case of Purnima Hore and another Vs. State of Assam, reported in 2023 SCC Online Gau. 1165.
¶5Mr. B. Kaushik, learned Standing counsel, Elementary Education Department fairly submits that the case of the petitioners is covered by the case of Purnima Hore (supra).
¶6In the case of Purnima Hore (supra), this Court passed the following directions : "118. In the backdrop of the above, this Court, therefore, disposes of the instant batch of writ petitions with the following observations and directions:-
(i) The writ petitioners who come within the fold of Stipendiary Teachers are entitled to Page No.# 6/8 the benefits under the Rules of 1969 and they are not covered under the NDCPS, 2009. The said petitioners are also entitled to subscribe to the GPF. The said petitioners would also be entitled to all other pensionary benefits to which a Government servant of corresponding rank is entitled to.
(ii) The writ petitioners who come within the fold of Dropped Teachers are not entitled to pension in terms with the Rules of 1969 as well as also shall not be entitled to join the fund in terms with the General Provident Fund (Assam Service) Rules, 1937, but they shall be governed by the New Pension Scheme applicable to the State Government employees of the corresponding rank.
(iii) The teachers coming within the fold of Teachers Appointed under the Operation Black Board, and more particularly, those teachers who were appointed pursuant to the creation of 7066 posts on 08.03.2021, would not be entitled to pension in terms with Rules of 1969 as well as also shall not be entitled to join the fund in terms with the General Provident Fund (Assam Service) Rules, 1937. They shall be governed by the New Pension Scheme applicable to State Government employees of corresponding rank.
(iv) The writ petitioners who come within the fold of Excess Teachers would not be entitled to the pension in terms with the Rules of 1969 as well as also shall not entitled to subscribe to the fund in terms with the General Provident Fund (Assam Service) Rules, 1937, but they shall be governed by the New Pension Scheme applicable to the State Government employees of the corresponding rank.
(v) The writ petitioners who come within the category of Teachers appointed on Ad-hoc Grant Basis would not be entitled to pension in terms with the Rules of 1969, but shall be governed by the New Pension Scheme applicable to the State Government employees of the corresponding rank. They would also not be entitled to join the fund in terms with the General Provident Fund (Assam Service) Rules, 1937.
(vi) The Teachers who have been brought within the fold of the State Sector Employees by regularization of their services by the Dima Hasao Autonomous District Council on or after 01.02.2005 would not get the benefit in terms with the Rules of 1969, but they shall be governed by the New Pension Scheme applicable to the State Page No.# 7/8 Government employees of the corresponding rank.
(vii) The teachers coming within the category of Dropped Teachers, Operation Black Board, Excess, Ad-hoc Grant as well as Dima Hasao as mentioned in Sub-Paragraph Nos.(ii), (iii), (iv) (v) & (vi) herein above as they come within the ambit of the New Defined Contribution Pension Scheme, 2009 shall be eligible for the benefit of retirement gratuity and death gratuity on the same terms and conditions as are applicable to the employees covered by the Rules of 1969 in view of the Office Memorandum dated 01.02.2021. (viii) The communication dated 23.02.2010 issued by the Director, Finance (Budget) Department to the Deputy Accountant General (P&A) is set aside and quashed.
(ix) It is observed that the instant judgment will come into effect prospectively. The State Government shall not be entitled to claim refund of any pension or pensionary benefits already granted to an employee on the basis of the directions passed by the various orders of this Court earlier. This direction has been given specifically for the fact that the State Government had allowed such orders so passed by the Coordinate Bench as well as the Division Bench of this Court to attain finality and have granted benefit to them. These persons shall continue to be entitled to the pension under the Rules of 1969 as per the directions of this Court earlier. The above directions is based upon the judgment of the Supreme Court in the case of Umadevi (3) (supra) wherein the Supreme Court at paragraph No.53 had categorically observed that those regularizations, if any, already made but not subjudiced need not be reopened based on the observations made in the said judgment.
(x) This Court further is of the opinion that the persons similarly situated to that of the writ petitioners coming within the category of Stipendiary Teachers, but who have not been able to approach this Court on account of various reasons, need not be deprived of the benefits of pension in terms with the Rules of 1969 as well as to subscribe to the fund in terms with the General Provident Fund (Assam Service) Rules, 1937. This Court, therefore, directs the respondent authorities to grant the benefits of pension in terms with the Rules of 1969 as well as to allow such persons to subscribe to the fund in terms with the General Provident Fund (Assam Service) Rules, 1937 after completing the necessary verification in that regard. The same may be done within a Page No.# 8/8 period of 6 (six) months from the date of the instant judgment."
¶7This Court after considering the facts in the present case, is also of the considered opinion that the judgment passed in the case of Purnima Hore (supra) covers the case of the petitioners in hand.
¶8Accordingly, this writ petition is disposed of directing the respondent-authorities to verify the documents as regards the appointment of the petitioners as Stipendiary Teachers and thereupon, after making necessary verification and if it is found that the petitioners fall within the ambit of the Stipendiary Teacher and were not granted the benefit of the pension under Assam Services (Pension Rules), 1969, although, the regular scale of pay was given to them, the petitioners shall be granted the benefits of pension in terms of the Rules of 1969.
¶9The respondents are, therefore, directed to consider the case of the petitioners in terms of the directions passed in the case of Purnima Hore (supra).
¶10After verification and after the relevant documents are submitted to the Office of the Accountant General, the Office of the Accountant General shall also allot the GPF accounts to the petitioners.
¶11With the above observations and directions, the writ petition is disposed of.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant
Case details
Parties and counsel
PageoNo.#o1/8 GAHC010072152024 ooooooo ooooooooooooooo ooooooooooooooooTHEoGAUHATIoHIGHoCOURTo (HIGHoCOURToOFoASSAM,oNAGALAND,oMIZORAMoANDoARUNACHALoPRADESH)o CaseoNo.o:oWP(C)/2009/2024o MUNINDRAoNATHoHAZARIKAoANDo6oORSo S/O-oSHRIoGANGADHARoHAZARIKAo R/OoVILLAGE-oGOSAIPATHARoNO.1o P.OoANDoP.S-oBIHPURIAo DISTRICT-oLAKHIMPUR,oASSAMo PIN-784161 2:oRIJUMONIoDUWARAH oW/O-oKRISNAoKNT.oLAHANo R/O-oVILLAGE-MORIBORoDOLONIo P.O-oHARIBORoNOHORANIo P.S-oLALUKo DISTRICT-oLAKHIMPUR oASSAMo PINoNO.-784160 3:oRUSENAoBEGUM oW/O-oNAJIBoALIo R/O-oVILLAGE-oPHENKHATIo P.O-LALUKo P.S-oLALUKo DISTRICT-LAKHIMPUR oASSAMo PINoNO.-784160 4:oJUBEDAoKHATUN oW/O-oJAINALABEDINo R/O-VILLAGE-ISLAMPURoBESAPATHYo P.O-oDHARNAPURo P.S-oLALUKo DISTRICT-oLAKHIMPUR oASSAMo PageoNo.#o2/8 PINoNO.-784160 5:oBANDANAoGOGOI oW/O-oAMIYAoKUMARoPACHANIo R/O-VILLAGE-AHUCHAULoGAONo P.O-oLAKHIMPURo P.S-oLAKHIMPURo DISTRICT-oLAKHIMPUR oASSAMo PIN-787001 6:oTILUTTAMAoGOGOI oW/O-oKUSHALCHAMUWAo R/O-oVILLAGE-oNAKARIoWARDoNO.2o P.O-oNORTHoLAKHIMPURo DISTRICT-oLAKHIMPUR oASSAMo PIN-o787001 7:oLAKHIoDAS oW/O-oPROBHATHAZARIKAo R/O-VILLAGE-oKADAMKOCHARIo P.O-oCHARAIMORIAo DISTRICT-oLAKHIMPURo PIN-78703o VERSUSo THEoSTATEoOFoASSAMoANDo10oORSo REPRESENTEDoBYoTHEoCOMMISSIONERoANDoSECRETARYoTOoTHEoGOVT.o OFoASSAM,oDEPARTMENToOFoELEMENTARYoEDUCATION,oDISPUR,o GUWAHATI,o781006 2:THEoCOMMISSIONERoANDoSECRETARYoTOoTHEoGOVT.oOFoASSAM oFINANCEoDEPARTMENT oDISPURoGUWAHATI o781006. 3:THEoDIRECTORoOFoELEMENTARYoEDUCATION oASSAM oKAHILIPARA oGUWAHATI-19 4:THEoACCOUNTANToGENERALo(AoANDoE) oASSAM oMAIDAMGAON Page No.# 3/8 BELTOLA PIN-781029. 5:THE DIRECTOR OF PENSION ASSAM HOUSEFED COMPLEX DISPUR GUWAHATI-781006 6:THE DISTRICT ELEMENTARY EDUCATION OFFICER LAKHIMPUR P.O AND P.S- NORTH LAKHIMPUR DISTRICT-NORTH LAKHIMPUR ASSAM PIN-787001 7:THE DEPUTY INSPECTOR OF SCHOOLS NORTH LAKHIMPUR P.O AND P.S -NORTH LAKHIMPUR DISTRICT-LAKHIMPUR PIN 787001 8:THE TREASURY OFFICER LAKHIMPUR P.O AND P.S-LAKHIMPUR DISTRICT-LAKHIMPUR ASSAM PIN-787001 9:THE BLOCK ELEMENTARY EDUCATION OFFICER BIHPURIA P.O AND P.S- BIHPURIA DISTRICT-LAKHIMPUR ASSAM PIN-784161 10:THE BLOCK ELEMENTARY EDUCATION OFFICER LAKHIMPUR P.O AND P.S- LAKHIMPUR DISTRICT-LAKHIMPUR ASSAM PIN-787001 11:THE TREASURY OFFICER BIHPURIA SUB-TREASURY P.O AND P.S-BIHPURIA DISTRICT-LAKHIMPUR ASSAM PIN-78416 Advocate for the Petitioner : MD. A HASSAN Advocate for the Respondent : SC, ELEM. EDU Page No.# 4/8 BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE LANUSUNGKUM JAMIR
Source: High Court of Gauhati, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.