Md. Minajuddin Laskar v. The State of Assam

PageoNo.#o1/2 GAHC010073582024 ooooooo ooooooooooooooo ooooooooooooooooTHEoGAUHATIoHIGHoCOURTo (HIGHoCOURToOFoASSAM,oNAGALAND,oMIZORAMoANDoARUNACHALoPRADESH)o CaseoNo.o:oBailoAppln./1036/2024o MD.oMINAJUDDINoLASKARo S/OoABDULoRAHMANoLASKARo R/OoVILL-oBINAKENDIoJUGIJAN,oP.S.oJAMUNAMUKHo DIST.oHOJAI,oASSAMo PIN-782428 VERSUSo THEoSTATEoOFoASSAMo REPoBYoTHEoPP,oASSAM AdvocateoforotheoPetitionerooooo:oMR.oMoKALITAo AdvocateoforotheoRespondento:oPP,oASSAMoo oooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo ::kBEFOREk::k HON'BLEkMR.kJUSTICEkPARTHIVJYOTIkSAIKIA o kOkkkRkkkDkkkEkkkRk

19.04.2024 o ooooooooooooHeard Mr. M. Kalita, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner as well as Ms. A. Begum, learned Addl. Public Prosecutor representing the State of Assam. Page No.# 2/2

¶2This is the second bail application filed by the petitioner Md. Minajuddin Laskar who was arrested in connection Pathsala P.S. Case No.81/2023, registered under Section 379 of the IPC read with Section 66(C) and 66(D) of the Information Technology Act.

¶3On 25.10.2023, the informant came to know that between 12.10.2023 and

23.10.2023 somebody has fraudulently withdrawn ₹3,41,700/- from his Bank Account.

¶4On 27.03.2024, the bail application of the petitioner was rejected by this Court after perusal of the case diary.

¶5Today, no new ground has been assigned for consideration of his bail prayer.

¶6The petitioner has pleaded that the length of detention undergone by him in custody should be taken up as a ground for releasing him on bail.

¶7I have considered the submissions made by the learned counsel of both sides.

¶8I do not find any reason to allow the bail prayer of the petitioner. Accordingly, the bail application of the petitioner is rejected and disposed of.

JUDGE Comparing Assistant