- Court
- High Court of Gauhati
- Decided
- 27 April 2023
- Bench
- Soumitra Saikia
- Case no.
- Bail Appln. 1287/2023
Judgment
ORDER Date : 27.04.2023 In view of the order passed in I/A.(Crl.)/330/2023 the Page No.# 2/4 Registry is directed to make necessary endorsements and corrections in respect of the name of the father of petitioner No.2 from Sri Kanhayalal Gupta to Lalchand Gupta.
¶2Heard Mr. R. Dubey, learned counsel appears for the petitioners. Also heard Mr. B.B. Gogoi, learned Additional Public Prosecutor appears for the State of Assam.
¶3The bail application has been preferred by the petitioners, namely, Sri Ayush Gupta and Sri Ajay Gupta, seeking bail in connection with Golaghat Police Station Case No. 109/2023 under Sections 120(B)/379/411/406/413/420 of Indian Penal Code. The petitioners were arrested on 09.03.2023 and since then he has been in custody.
¶4An FIR was lodged on 08.03.2023 by the informant, one, Joly Gogoi, SI(P), Golaghat Police Station. It was alleged that in connection with the investigation with another case namely, GLT PS GDE No. 144 dated 07.03.2023, when the I/O visited the Godowon of the petitioners, a total four and half bags of suspected Burmese areca nuts were seen concealed in jute bags and it was seized from the possession of the said accused persons. On the basis of the seizures made and the investigations carried on by the I/O, the petitioners are arrested on 09.03.2023 and since then they have been in custody.
¶5This Court has called for the Case Diary. Mr. B. B. Gogoi, learned Addl. P.P. has produced the case dairy as called for and has submitted that the FSL report in respect of the seized Page No.# 3/4 items have not been received. Similar report is awaited from FSL and Food Analysis Report is also awaited.
¶6Perusal of the case dairy reveals that the matter is still under investigation. The learned Addl. P.P also submits that the prime accused in the matter has not been arrested as on date and therefore, release of the present accused/petitioners at this stage may affect the investigation carried on.
¶7The Case Diary produced has been carefully perused. It is seen that the investigation has progressed in the matter; however, no charge-sheet has been filed as on date. The seized materials, which are stated to be Burmese areca nuts, were suspected to have been brought from across the border.
¶8The Case Diary does not reveal any materials to suggest that further custodial detention of the petitioners are necessary. Taking into account the period undergone in custody by the petitioners and the progress of investigation, the bail petition is allowed. Accordingly, petitioners are directed to be released on bail forthwith subject to executing a bail bond of Rs.30,000/-(Rupees thirty thousand) only with 2 local sureties of like amount to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Golaghat. The bail, granted however, subjected to the following conditions:-
i) The petitioners shall continue to appear before the police once a month and cooperate with the Investigating Officer as and when required, till Page No.# 4/4 completion of investigation.
ii) The petitioners shall not change his residence or place of business, without prior written permission from the Court of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Golaghat.
iii) That the petitioners shall not hamper or tamper with the investigation in any manner; and
iv) That the petitioners shall not, directly or indirectly, make any inducement, threat or promise to any person/witness acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him/her from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer in connection to this Police Station Case.
¶9If any of the conditions are found to be violated by the petitioners, then the Investigating Officer shall be at liberty to seek cancellation of the bail granted to the accused.
¶10With the above direction, the bail petition is accordingly allowed and disposed of.
¶11Return the Case Diary.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant
Case details
Parties and counsel
Page No.# 1/4 GAHC010073772023 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Bail Appln./1287/2023 AYUSH GUPTA AND ANR S/O SRI KANHAYALAL GUPTA R/O SRIMATA NAGAR, WARD NO. 5, GOLAGHAT, DIST. GOLAGHAT, ASSAM-785621 2: SRI AJAY GUPTA S/O LALCHAND GUPTA R/O SRIMANTA NAGAR WARD NO. 5 GOLAGHAT DIST. GOLAGHAT ASSAM-78562 VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM REP. BY THE PP, ASSAM Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. R DUBEY Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SOUMITRA SAIKIA
Source: High Court of Gauhati, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.