- Court
- High Court of Gauhati
- Decided
- 6 June 2024
- Bench
- Susmita Phukan Khaund
- Case no.
- AB 938/2024
Judgment
ORDER
07.06.2024 Heard Mr S Das, learned counsel for the petitioner, Sukuri Khatun.
¶2The petitioner has filed this application under Section 438 CrPC, with prayer for pre-arrest bail, as she is apprehending arrest in connection with PRC Case No. 1855/2023, arising out of Fakirganj PS Case No. 136/2018, corresponding to GR Case No. 2705/2018, registered under Sections 120(B)/304(B)/34 of the Indian Penal Code, Page No.# 2/3 1860
¶3Heard Ms S Jahan, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State of Assam/respondent.
¶4It is submitted that charge sheet has been laid against the petitioner and her husband.
¶5The allegation against the petitioner is that she along with her husband and other family members have assaulted the victim. The victim was the second wife of the accused Sagar Ali and the present petitioner is the first wife of accused Sagar Ali.
¶6I have considered the submissions at the Bar with circumspection.
¶7It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the Post-Mortem Report is contradictory to allegations of the informant. The informant is the father of the deceased.
¶8The Post-Mortem Report depicts that the victim had committed suicide by consuming poison, whereas the informant has alleged that the victim was assaulted by the petitioner and the other members of the family.
¶9I have considered the submission that the petitioner is willing to appear before the learned trial Court and cooperate with the trial, but as she is apprehending arrest she has preferred this petition with prayer for anticipatory bail.
¶10I have also considered the submissions at the Bar and perused the scanned copies of the Trial Court Record. Page No.# 3/3
¶11Considering all aspects and in view of my foregoing discussions, petition is allowed. In the event of her arrest, the petitioner shall be enlarged on bail of Rs. 50,000/-, with a suitable surety of the like amount to the satisfaction of the learned CJM, Dhubri, under the conditions that the petitioner shall appear before the learned CJM, Dhubri, within 7 (seven) days, failing which, bail order shall stand cancelled.
¶12In terms of above, Anticipatory Bail Application stands disposed of. JUDGE Comparing Assistant
Case details
Parties and counsel
Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010073962024 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : AB/938/2024 SUKURI KHATUN W/O- SAGAR ALI, VILL.- JHARNARCHAR FT. I, P.O.- JHARNARCHAR, P.S.- FAKIRGANJ, DIST.- DHUBRI, ASSAM, PIN- 783339. VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM REP BY THE PP, ASSAM Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. SURAJIT DAS Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM BEFORE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SUSMITA PHUKAN KHAUND
Source: High Court of Gauhati, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.