VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Gauhati High Court 2024 › High Court of Gauhati

Ikramul Hoque v. The State of Assam

Disposed Of
Court
High Court of Gauhati
Decided
21 April 2024
Bench
S. Justice Malasri Nandiauthor
Case no.
Bail Appln. 1061/2024

Judgment

ORDER

22.04.2024

Heard Mr. M. K. Hussain, learned counsel appearing for the accused petitioner as well as Mr. R. J. Baruah, learned Addl. P.P., Assam appearing for the State respondent. By this petition under Section 439 Cr.P.C., the accused-petitioner, namely, Ikramul Hoque, has prayed for grant of bail in connection with Moirabari P.S. Case No.18/2024 under Sections 120(B)/419/420/406/467/468/471/34 Page No.# 2/3 IPC read with Section 66(C)/66(D) of IT Act. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner is detained in judicial custody for last 74 days since his arrest i.e. on 08.02.2024 and the other co-accused have been granted bail considering the length of detention. He therefore, prayed that considering the length of detention, bail prayer of the petitioner may be considered. Mr. R. J. Baruah, learned Additional Public Prosecutor has produced the case diary and submits that sufficient incriminating material has been received against the petitioner. I have heard the submission of the learned counsel for both the parties and also perused the case diary. In view of the submission of learned counsel for both the parties and considering the length of detention, this Court is of the view that further custodial interrogation of the accused-petitioner is not necessary in the interest of investigation of the case. Accordingly, the petitioner, named above, shall be released on bail, on furnishing bail bond of Rs.50,000/- with one suitable surety of the like amount, to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Morigaon. The direction for bail is further subject to the conditions that the petitioner:

(a) shall not leave the territorial jurisdiction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Morigaon without prior written permission from him/her;

(b) shall not hamper with the investigation, or tamper with the evidence of the case;

(c) shall not, directly or indirectly, make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer. Page No.# 3/3 In terms of the above, this bail application stands disposed of.

JUDGE Comparing Assistant

Case details

Parties and counsel

Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010074212024 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Bail Appln./1061/2024 IKRAMUL HOQUE S/O AHAMMAD ALI VILL- TATIKATA PATHER P.O. AND P.S. MOIRABARI DIST. MORIGAON, ASSAM PIN-782126. VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM REP BY THE PP, ASSAM Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. M K HUSSAIN Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM BEFORE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE MALASRI NANDI

Source: High Court of Gauhati, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.