Mafizuddin Ahmed v. The State of Assam

ORDER

03.05.2024

Heard Mr. J.I. Borbhuiya, learned counsel for the accused-petitioner and Ms. N. Das, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the respondent State of Assam.

¶2By this application under Section 439, Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [CrPC], the accused-petitioner viz. Mafizuddin Ahmed has prayed for his release on bail in connection Page No.# 2/3 with Gorchuk Police Station Case no. 80/2024 registered under Sections 461/380, Indian Penal Code [IPC].

¶3In the First Information Report [FIR], lodged on 13.03.2023, an incident of theft which occurred at the godown at Pub-Boragaon, Gorchuk, Guwahati of M/s Ronak Enterprise, was reported. The stolen items were E-rickshaw Batteries, E-rickshaw Chargers and E-rickshaw Parts. The CCTV installed was found broken and the DVR box was found stolen.

¶4In the course of investigation, a number of persons including the accused-petitioner, have been arrested. As per the forwarding report dated 29.03.2024, 48 nos. of stolen E-rickshaw Chargers and E-rickshaw Parts have been recovered from the house of one Ramjan Ali.

¶5Ms. Das, learned Additional Public Prosecutor who has received the case diary, has submitted on the basis of the materials, collected during the course of investigation carried out so far, available in the case diary, that the accused-petitioner is found to be a person involved with the other accused persons who were instrumental in committing the act of theft. Ms. Das has further submitted that no stolen item has, however, been recovered from the custody and possession of the accused-petitioner.

¶6The accused-petitioner after arrest, was produced before the Court of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Kamrup [M] on 29.03.2024 and since then, the accused-petitioner is in custody for a period of 36 days till date.

¶7Having regard to the fact that the accused-petitioner is in custody for a period of 36 days since 29.03.2024 and considering the fact that no stolen item is recovered from the custody and possession of the accused-petitioner, this Court is of the considered view that further custodial detention of the accused-petitioner is not necessary for the purpose of carrying out further investigation into the case and his release on bail, at this stage of investigation, is unlikely to cause any adverse effect into the further investigation of the case, provided he continues to extend his assistance and co-operation in the further investigation of the case.

¶8Accordingly, it is directed that the accused-petitioner shall be released on bail on Page No.# 3/3 furnishing a bail bond of Rs. 50,000/-with one local surety of the like amount to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Kamrup [M], Guwahati subject to the conditions that :-

[i] the accused-petitioner shall co-operate with the investigation and make himself available for interrogation whenever required by the Investigating Officer [I.O.] of the case; [ii] the accused-petitioner shall not, directly or indirectly, make any inducement, threat or promise to any witness acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the court or to any police officer; [iii] the accused-petitioner shall not obstruct or hamper the police investigation and not to play mischief with the evidence collected or yet to be collected by the police; [iv] the accused-petitioner shall maintain law and order and he shall not commit an offence similar to the offence of which he is accused, or of the commission of which he is suspected; and [v] the accused-petitioner shall regularly remain present during the trial and co-operate the Court to complete the trial for the above offences, if charge sheeted in the case.

¶9The bail application stands disposed of in the aforesaid terms. JUDGE Comparing Assistant

Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010074592024 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Bail Appln./1060/2024 MAFIZUDDIN AHMED S/O MD. MOMIN ALI R/O VILL- BORAMARA P.S. MIKIRBHETA DIST. MORIGAON, ASSAM VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM REP. BY THE LD. PP, ASSAM Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. J I BORBHUIYA Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MANISH CHOUDHURY