- Court
- High Court of Gauhati
- Decided
- 12 May 2024
- Bench
- Robin Phukan
- Case no.
- AB 995/2024
Judgment
ORDER
13.05.2024
Heard Mr. S. Hazarika, learned counsel for the applicant and Mr. B.B. Gogoi, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State respondent.
¶2This application, under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, is preferred by applicant namely, Smti. Pompi Boruah, who has been apprehending arrest in connection with North Lakhimpur P.S. Case No. Page No.# 2/3 75/2024, under Sections 406/420 of the IPC, for grant of pre-arrest bail.
¶3It is to be noted here that the said case has been registered on the basis of an FIR lodged by the Branch Manager, Union Bank of India, North Lakhimpur Branch, on 28.03.2021. The essence of allegation made in the FIR is that on 18.03.2021, the Bank had erroneously credited a sum of Rs. 37,60,200/- in the Savings Bank Account No. 641102010003481, maintained by the applicant in the Union Bank of India, North Lakhimpur Branch and thereafter, a request was made to the applicant for refunding the amount, but, the said amount had already been withdrawn by the applicant from the said account.
¶4Mr. Hazarika, learned counsel for the applicant submits that this Court was pleased to grant interim protection to the applicant, vide order dated
10.04.2024, and pursuant to the said order, the applicant had appeared before the IO and cooperating with the investigating agency and therefore, it is contended to make the interim order dated 10.04.2024, absolute in the same terms and conditions.
¶5On the other hand, Mr. Gogoi, learned Additional Public Prosecutor submits that he has not received the case diary, but he has the instruction that the I.O. has already completed investigation and laid Charge-Sheet against the applicant, under Sections 406/420 of the IPC, vide Charge-Sheet No. 68/2024, dated 30.04.2024.
¶6In view of above, this Court is inclined to dispose of this anticipatory application by directing the applicant to appear before the learned court below on or before 28.05.2024, and to apply for regular bail and in event of filing such an application, the learned Court below shall consider the same in accordance with law. Page No.# 3/3
¶7Till then, the interim order dated 10.04.2024, stands extended.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant
Case details
Parties and counsel
Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010075542024 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : AB/995/2024 SMTI POMPI BORUAH W/O LATE MANOJ SHAH, R/O WARD NO. 8, NEAR SADAR THANA, DIST- NORTH LAKHIMPUR, ASSAM VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, ASSAM Advocate for the Petitioner : MR B KAUSHIK Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ROBIN PHUKAN
Source: High Court of Gauhati, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.